Forum
»
50 year old vaccinated & boosted actor dies from (likely) covid
01-15-2024, 04:19 PM
-
#61
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Results of the study are the same regardless of what you choose to believe..I find it helpful to read a study, even a pre-print, before submitting it as support

01-15-2024, 04:53 PM
-
#62
Originally Posted By Paul
Results of the study are the same regardless of what you choose to believe..
Originally Posted By Paul
Which line(s) support that claim?Over a year..in the control group..
It's a pre-print and the lines are numbered.
01-15-2024, 05:39 PM
-
#63
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By dakensta⏩
Mind you, we know he was vaccinated and boosted because of SAG and I am speculating he died of covid due to comments made by his fiancé. So, there is strong reason for both.Cliffs of thrad:
50 year old actor, who OP imagines is "strongly likely" to have been vaxxed and boostered, dies from what OP thinks was "likely" covid.
Have I missed anything?
50 year old actor, who OP imagines is "strongly likely" to have been vaxxed and boostered, dies from what OP thinks was "likely" covid.
Have I missed anything?
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
01-15-2024, 05:53 PM
-
#64
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
-
- Bodhy
- Paddling to New Zealand
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 17,326
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
I'd be interested to know if he died from effects of the vaccine.
Because, if so, this would be the first time in human history a vaccine has caused a death due to long-term effects and it would literally rewrite our knowledge of immunology and vaccinology.
Because, if so, this would be the first time in human history a vaccine has caused a death due to long-term effects and it would literally rewrite our knowledge of immunology and vaccinology.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
01-15-2024, 06:01 PM
-
#65
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Directly, nothing we know (even second hand) would suggest the vaccine did this -- unless repeated vaccines and boosters, as some Doctors speculate, over time are weakening people's immune systems and their specific response to covid.I'd be interested to know if he died from effects of the vaccine.
Because, if so, this would be the first time in human history a vaccine has caused a death due to long-term effects and it would literally rewrite our knowledge of immunology and vaccinology.
Because, if so, this would be the first time in human history a vaccine has caused a death due to long-term effects and it would literally rewrite our knowledge of immunology and vaccinology.
I do sense some people are nervous or upset at the potential implications of a younger healthy appearing guy dying of a disease he was repeatedly vaccinated and boosted over, though. One where it's selling point has repeatedly been goal-shifted and pushed back, currently to just being something that reduces symptoms, which does not seem to have happened here in the least. Almost as if it did the opposite, which the idea of that alone seems to make some people very uncomfortable.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
01-15-2024, 06:07 PM
-
#66
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,185
- Rep Power: 441422
-
-
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Wouldn’t necessarily be “longterm” if he’d recently gotten a booster shot. Kind of like this guy…gets boosted, gets very “sick” within two weeks, tests negative for Covid, heart blows up and kills him.I'd be interested to know if he died from effects of the vaccine.
Because, if so, this would be the first time in human history a vaccine has caused a death due to long-term effects and it would literally rewrite our knowledge of immunology and vaccinology.
Because, if so, this would be the first time in human history a vaccine has caused a death due to long-term effects and it would literally rewrite our knowledge of immunology and vaccinology.
https://bloodyelbow.com/2024/01/09/g...well-miss-you/
tweet below the "update" is conveniently missing context:
01-15-2024, 06:17 PM
-
#67
01-15-2024, 06:23 PM
-
#68
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Figure 3..shows spike protein floating around after 15 months.Which line(s) support that claim?
It's a pre-print and the lines are numbered.
It's a pre-print and the lines are numbered.
As a result, Patterson made another publication:
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1844677/v1
SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein Persistence in SARS-CoV-2 Negative Post-Vaccination Individuals with Long COVID/ PASC-Like Symptoms
In this paper, figure 2 shows that 'Control' patients do have S1 floating around, although they try to push that it's lower than in long-covid sufferers, it should be zero in the 'healthy controls', though.
01-15-2024, 06:24 PM
-
#69
- BigBallsMcgee
- Registered User
-
- BigBallsMcgee
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Age: 35
- Posts: 35,726
- Rep Power: 48512
-
-
I suked my own dik last night, it tasted like skittles
01-15-2024, 06:26 PM
-
#70
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Just the one booster, and no significant side effects. They didn't actually force me to do anything, so they wouldn't be liable, they politely gave me the option to quit if I didn't want to keep working under their rules. Fair enough.A government funded job, that made you get two booster shots? And let me guess, if you suffered negative side effects, they're not liable?
01-15-2024, 06:51 PM
-
#71
Originally Posted By Paul
Which line(s)?Figure 3..shows spike protein floating around after 15 months.
As a result, Patterson made another publication:
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1844677/v1
SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein Persistence in SARS-CoV-2 Negative Post-Vaccination Individuals with Long COVID/ PASC-Like Symptoms
In this paper, figure 2 shows that 'Control' patients do have S1 floating around, although they try to push that it's lower than in long-covid sufferers, it should be zero in the 'healthy controls', though.
As a result, Patterson made another publication:
https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-1844677/v1
SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein Persistence in SARS-CoV-2 Negative Post-Vaccination Individuals with Long COVID/ PASC-Like Symptoms
In this paper, figure 2 shows that 'Control' patients do have S1 floating around, although they try to push that it's lower than in long-covid sufferers, it should be zero in the 'healthy controls', though.
01-15-2024, 06:58 PM
-
#72
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Figure 3Which line(s)?
nice attempt to pigeon hole..but we both know the game you are playing lol
see 1h29m30s ...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/AwJ21uzUPkhm/
Person who knows most about spike and where it is in the body and how long it lasts is Bruce Patterson"
"As far as he can tell, it doesn't get out of the body"
"Still waiting for someone to take a vaccine and be shown to be clear of messenger RNA and spike protein"
01-15-2024, 06:59 PM
-
#73
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
-
- JUSA
- No Agony, No Bragony
- Join Date: Nov 2004
- Location: Texas
- Posts: 50,517
- Rep Power: 458793
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Statistically those who died of/with covid:Anybody dies with covid detectable in their system - comorbidities and poor choices lead to poor health outcomes
Anybody dies after receiving a covid vaccine, at any point in time - vaccines cause death.
Really?
Anybody dies after receiving a covid vaccine, at any point in time - vaccines cause death.
Really?
- Average age of 78
- 80% were obese or grossly obese
- On average 2.8 comorbidities
Sorry those facts bother you so very much.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
01-15-2024, 07:06 PM
-
#74
Originally Posted By Paul
Bitchute isn't referenced in the original paper you shared.Figure 3
nice attempt to pigeon hole..but we both know the game you are playing lol
see 1h29m30s ...
Person who knows most about spike and where it is in the body and how long it lasts is Bruce Patterson"
"As far as he can tell, it doesn't get out of the body"
"Still waiting for someone to take a vaccine and be shown to be clear of messenger RNA and spike protein"
nice attempt to pigeon hole..but we both know the game you are playing lol
see 1h29m30s ...
Person who knows most about spike and where it is in the body and how long it lasts is Bruce Patterson"
"As far as he can tell, it doesn't get out of the body"
"Still waiting for someone to take a vaccine and be shown to be clear of messenger RNA and spike protein"
Which lines are you referencing in your claim?
Accurate citations are important these days

01-15-2024, 07:08 PM
-
#75
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Citation needed stating I claimed it was...Bitchute isn't referenced in the original paper you shared

nice edit..
It stays there as long as the mRNA is active in the cells, and as it is in the DNA of the cells, it is active until the cell dies, which is up to a ~ 7 year span.
The spike endures...
Here for over 4 months:
https://imgur.com/a/o27r2tD
The IGG4 class switch is caused by permanent presence of the spikes. It gets worse and worse as time goes by...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36548397/
01-15-2024, 07:09 PM
-
#76
01-15-2024, 07:11 PM
-
#77
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
stop editing your postsCan you share the cite?
01-15-2024, 07:12 PM
-
#78
01-15-2024, 07:12 PM
-
#79
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Figure 3..as I've explained many times nowWhich line(s)?
01-15-2024, 07:14 PM
-
#80
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,185
- Rep Power: 441422
-
-
Originally Posted By Paul
Take it as a good sign. When he is furiously rapid-fire editing his posts you know he’s flustered.stop editing your posts
01-15-2024, 07:14 PM
-
#81
Originally Posted By Paul
Not the paper you shared.Citation needed stating I claimed it was...
nice edit..
It stays there as long as the mRNA is active in the cells, and as it is in the DNA of the cells, it is active until the cell dies, which is up to a ~ 7 year span.
The spike endures...
Here for over 4 months:
The IGG4 class switch is caused by permanent presence of the spikes. It gets worse and worse as time goes by...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36548397/

nice edit..
It stays there as long as the mRNA is active in the cells, and as it is in the DNA of the cells, it is active until the cell dies, which is up to a ~ 7 year span.
The spike endures...
Here for over 4 months:
The IGG4 class switch is caused by permanent presence of the spikes. It gets worse and worse as time goes by...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36548397/
01-15-2024, 07:15 PM
-
#82
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
No chit lol...it is another paper supporting the argument.Not the paper you shared.
01-15-2024, 07:16 PM
-
#83
01-15-2024, 07:17 PM
-
#84
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Gotta love how a self proclaimed "scientist" is unable to comprehend a simple studyGotta love how posts by those who support the narrative aren't reviewed.


01-15-2024, 07:18 PM
-
#85
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
After close to four years you don't know this???Can you share the cite?
01-15-2024, 07:18 PM
-
#86
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I give out too many reps that by the time I want to neg someone, I've used them all upIt boggles the mind that miscers still try to argue with Justin's Little Cuck in an intellectually honest manner.
Just neg the shill and move on.
Just neg the shill and move on.

01-15-2024, 07:20 PM
-
#87
Originally Posted By Paul
You made a claim and attempted to attribute that claim to the paper you posted.No chit lol...it is another paper supporting the argument.
When informed the paper you posted does not support the claim your response is "no chit lol".
Am I correct that this approach to discussion is considered "intellectually honest"?
01-15-2024, 07:21 PM
-
#88
01-15-2024, 07:28 PM
-
#89
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I told you where to look 3 times now in the initial paper, I then gave you two other references that supported the claim. The only one being dishonest is you by continuing to ask.."which line"..when it is clear in Figure 3You made a claim and attempted to attribute that claim to the paper you posted.
When informed the paper you posted does not support the claim your response is "no chit lol".
Am I correct that this approach to discussion is considered "intellectually honest"?
When informed the paper you posted does not support the claim your response is "no chit lol".
Am I correct that this approach to discussion is considered "intellectually honest"?
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
That was from awhile ago, but thank you for showing it was well deserved by your comments ITTYour most recent neg is near the top of my CP

01-15-2024, 07:34 PM
-
#90
Originally Posted By Paul
You posted this:I told you where to look 3 times now in the initial paper, I then gave you two other references that supported the claim. The only one being dishonest is you by continuing to ask.."which line"..when it is clear in Figure 3
Originally Posted By Paul
Which line(s) reflect what you claim is in the paper?Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Up to 15 Months Post-Infection
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...905v1.full.pdf
"healthy controls" (vaxxed) showed spike for over a year..
"healthy controls" (vaxxed) showed spike for over a year..
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...905v1.full.pdf
"healthy controls" (vaxxed) showed spike for over a year..
"healthy controls" (vaxxed) showed spike for over a year..
I don't get how/why this is considered intellectually honest

Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts