Forum
»
Long COVID is associated with severe cognitive slowing
01-28-2024, 11:00 AM
-
#31
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
-
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 62,386
- Rep Power: 451180
-
-
Originally Posted By volleys⏩
So if someone lost taste and smell 2 years ago and* it( taste+ smell) never returned*, then what do you call that...... intermediate Covid-19?Long covid is a ****ing scam lmao
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
01-28-2024, 11:02 AM
-
#32
Originally Posted By HaiMeesk⏩
Why? How?OP's a paid shill - either Big Pharma or Canadian govt or both. As long as he's getting paid and as long as miscers keep interacting with him, he'll keep doing it. Whatever pays the rent.
Just lol at the idea that anyone who doesn't buy the narrative must be getting paid to question
Just lol

01-28-2024, 11:02 AM
-
#33
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,185
- Rep Power: 441422
-
-
Originally Posted By HaiMeesk⏩
Unfortunately it’s even sadder than that. He doesn’t even get paid, he just dedicates this amount of time to it because he enjoys irritating people. A rather pitiful existence, but I guess at least he isn’t actually physically harming people.OP's a paid shill - either Big Pharma or Canadian govt or both. As long as he's getting paid and as long as miscers keep interacting with him, he'll keep doing it. Whatever pays the rent.
01-28-2024, 11:06 AM
-
#34
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
Sucks that you gave up. But kind of expectedUnfortunately it’s even sadder than that. He doesn’t even get paid, he just dedicates this amount of time to it because he enjoys irritating people. A rather pitiful existence, but I guess at least he isn’t actually physically harming people.
Props for recognizing limits.

01-28-2024, 11:13 AM
-
#35
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Lol.I guess his limit was not playing chess with a pigeon, as was mine.
Why make an effort to have an intellectually honest discussion with someone who is know to flat out lie in support of his argument?
The outcome is known, and it's very similar to playing chess with a pigeon:
The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, chits on the board, and declares himself the winner.
Congrats on being a pigeon, beavercel.
Why make an effort to have an intellectually honest discussion with someone who is know to flat out lie in support of his argument?
The outcome is known, and it's very similar to playing chess with a pigeon:
The pigeon knocks over all the pieces, chits on the board, and declares himself the winner.
Congrats on being a pigeon, beavercel.

Cuz suggesting regression is magical or nefarious a solid argument?
It's much easier, and likely feels safer, to support the narrative by proxy.
Making it about discussants carries little to no intellectual risk.
You get it

01-28-2024, 11:19 AM
-
#36
01-28-2024, 11:20 AM
-
#37
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
-
- x-trainer ben
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 62,386
- Rep Power: 451180
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Well to be fair that is about 70% of the current iteration of the site, because tit for tat debate is way to hard and hurts some posters.Lol.
Cuz suggesting regression is magical or nefarious a solid argument?
It's much easier and likely feels safer to support the narrative by proxy.
Making it about discussants carries little to no intellectual risk
Cuz suggesting regression is magical or nefarious a solid argument?
It's much easier and likely feels safer to support the narrative by proxy.
Making it about discussants carries little to no intellectual risk

Just repeat a line over and over like Rainman....... and it releases you from thinking, or pull some old lines from you files and database and viola no new thinking.
I mean why get an aneurism or clot when you can just repeat lines 104 times and not strain your brain!?
Take for example this, "Damn, if only they had been banished to an unheated garage when they were sick"
I mean it is a total mother fkn lie, but it has been repeated 104 times so the gullible sheep.... swallow that goo like warm Caramel syrup.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
01-28-2024, 11:21 AM
-
#38
01-28-2024, 11:32 AM
-
#39
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
All that matters is that anything or anyone who questions the narrative gets shuts down.The awesome part is how I can't apply such a story to anyone else... You're the only person who tried to do something as stupid as that to support the narrative.
What about posting a mathematically impossible model in an effort to pass it off as statistical data?

What about posting a mathematically impossible model in an effort to pass it off as statistical data?

Hilariously formulaic

01-28-2024, 11:36 AM
-
#40
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Yes, because every social media outlet must toe the line to the official narrative. Even when it's dangerous.All that matters is that anything or anyone who questions the narrative gets shuts down.
Hilariously formulaic

Hilariously formulaic

Strong self-awarness
01-28-2024, 11:37 AM
-
#41
Originally Posted By Paul
I haven't posted anything in here from social mediaYes, because every social media outlet must be toe the line to the official narrative. Even when it's dangerous.
Strong self-awarness
Strong self-awarness

Not a single comment on the study in OP other than:

01-28-2024, 11:41 AM
-
#42
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Wat??I haven't posted anything in here from social media
Not a single comment on the study in OP other than:


Not a single comment on the study in OP other than:

This forum IS social media dum dum
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/social-media.asp

01-28-2024, 11:43 AM
-
#43
01-28-2024, 11:44 AM
-
#44
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You post ON this forum...are you autistic?I didn't post links from this forum.
01-28-2024, 11:56 AM
-
#45
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Oh don't make that mistake...I just found it funny that nobody can/will look past a title.
Just lol

Just lol

It's not the title..it's you..

01-28-2024, 11:57 AM
-
#46
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Which one?Just like how the model that you tried to pass of as statistical data were published numbers. Mathematically impossible to the point where the population of Ontario would have needed to be off by over a million people, but they were in fact published numbers.

But, the goal of this digression is just to avoid talking about infection possibly having negative consequences, right?
01-28-2024, 11:58 AM
-
#47
01-28-2024, 12:01 PM
-
#48
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Sometimes it's more useful to speak of the things that we are fully capable of avoiding the dangers of than the things that we are less capable of.Which one?
But, the goal of this digression is just to avoid talking about infection possibly having negative consequences, right?
But, the goal of this digression is just to avoid talking about infection possibly having negative consequences, right?
For instance, we all must drive and face the possibility of being in an accident..but we don't all have to drink and drive.
Taking the jab is like drinking and driving..one is a must, the other is just an added danger you've put yourself in
01-28-2024, 12:03 PM
-
#49
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
I think it's your deceptive track record that people have an issue with..that's something that only you are to blame for...not the members of this forumMy point exactly

01-28-2024, 12:04 PM
-
#50
Originally Posted By Paul
Sure.Sometimes it's more useful to speak of the things that we are fully capable of avoiding the dangers of than the things that we are less capable of.
For instance, we all must drive and face the possibility of being in an accident..but we don't all have to drink and drive.
Taking the jab is like drinking and driving..one is a must, the other is just an added danger you've put yourself in
For instance, we all must drive and face the possibility of being in an accident..but we don't all have to drink and drive.
Taking the jab is like drinking and driving..one is a must, the other is just an added danger you've put yourself in
But this study shows (repeated) infection might come with some negative consequences.
01-28-2024, 01:04 PM
-
#51
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
You know exactly which one.Which one?
But, the goal of this digression is just to avoid talking about infection possibly having negative consequences, right?
But, the goal of this digression is just to avoid talking about infection possibly having negative consequences, right?

Here's what you don't seem to understand - if you keep posting misinformation in support of the narrative you follow, people are going to stop even clicking on your links.
I know I did, because if your claims or links are continually proven to be misinformation, why bother checking to see if you eventually post something that is actually true?

01-28-2024, 12:05 PM
-
#52
Originally Posted By Paul
Forum vs JLC.I think it's your deceptive track record that people have an issue with..that's something that only you are to blame for...not the members of this forum
The ol' appeal to collective/majority
Lol

01-28-2024, 12:05 PM
-
#53
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Studies can be manipulated and often interrupted/skewed to show bias...I can show you how this is done if you likeSure.
But this study shows (repeated) infection might come with some negative consequences.
But this study shows (repeated) infection might come with some negative consequences.
01-28-2024, 01:05 PM
-
#54
Originally Posted By Paul
Beavercels are not known for their self awareness - it seems to be a trait all of them seem to be lacking in.I think it's your deceptive track record that people have an issue with..that's something that only you are to blame for...not the members of this forum

01-28-2024, 12:06 PM
-
#55
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
I don't really expect any of the regulars to even attempt to read a study like thisYou know exactly which one.
Here's what you don't seem to understand - if you keep posting misinformation in support of the narrative you follow, people are going to stop even clicking on your links.
I know I did, because if your claims or links are continually proven to be misinformation, why bother checking to see if you eventually post something that is actually true?

Here's what you don't seem to understand - if you keep posting misinformation in support of the narrative you follow, people are going to stop even clicking on your links.
I know I did, because if your claims or links are continually proven to be misinformation, why bother checking to see if you eventually post something that is actually true?


Others might not see work like this in their day to day, so now it's here for perusal.
Pretending I have some control over the content of every article is flattering, but just plain silly.
01-28-2024, 12:07 PM
-
#56
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
It's more of aForum vs JLC.
The ol' appeal to collective/majority
Lol

The ol' appeal to collective/majority
Lol

Truth vs deception..
Your track record shows you are deceptive
01-28-2024, 12:08 PM
-
#57
Originally Posted By Paul
I've seen the youtube video.Studies can be manipulated and often interrupted/skewed to show bias...I can show you how this is done if you like
I've also seen that you seem to lack some fundamental understanding on these topics

01-28-2024, 12:09 PM
-
#58
Originally Posted By Paul
It's more of a
Truth vs deception..
Your track record shows you are deceptive
Truth vs deception..
Your track record shows you are deceptive
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Pretending I have some control over the content of every article is flattering, but just plain silly.

.
01-28-2024, 01:10 PM
-
#59
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Please point out where I said "you have control over the content of every article".I don't really expect any of the regulars to even attempt to read a study like this
Others might not see work like this in their day to day, so now it's here for perusal.
Pretending I have some control over the content of every article is flattering, but just plain silly.

Others might not see work like this in their day to day, so now it's here for perusal.
Pretending I have some control over the content of every article is flattering, but just plain silly.
But you do have control over what articles you link, and if those articles continuously turn out to be pro-narrative misinformation - that's entirely on you.

01-28-2024, 12:10 PM
-
#60
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
was that before or after you lied about transmissible viral load size, the mask stopping viral transmission, the definition of vaccine not being changed, ..and on an on your lies go..?I've seen the youtube video.
I've also seen that you seem to lack some fundamental understanding on these topics
I've also seen that you seem to lack some fundamental understanding on these topics

Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts