Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Trust the Science: Vaccine(s) CONFIRMED 100% Effective in MULTIPLE studies
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 173
  2. First
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Last
post 1697194563 01-30-2024, 03:19 PM
-
#91
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By Anachron
You still don't get it, do you?

Just LOL - but I guess that's par for the course for you, someone who has just claimed that he was "psychologically abused" by my post.
I get that you misrepresenting words may work with the low IQ crowd boyo, but I'm gonna call you out every time I see it.

Do better boyo.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1697194813 01-30-2024, 03:24 PM
-
#92
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron
Also interesting to see how J.L.C. asked for people to answer what vaccines meet the criteria that he couldn't, up to this point, after multiple request, clearly define.

Still lulzy tho

Which vaccines meet (undefined) misc criteria? Why?
post 1697195183 01-30-2024, 03:33 PM
-
#93
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  1. SillieBazzillie
  2. Md, Misc, Old-Brah
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 46,410
  7. Rep Power: 219352
Originally Posted By Anachron
I wonder if you realize what you're calling me out for is actually me calling out someone else for same thing, right?

I mean, you're not that dumb, are you?

Oh wait, you literally just argued for a page or so without realizing that, only to concede the argument by admitting that my post "psychologically abused" you.
LOL, don't be mad boyo.

I got your number.
Early AM workout crew.
Holy crap dude, Satan's huge crew.
post 1697197083 01-30-2024, 04:12 PM
-
#94
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 14,311
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 161966
Originally Posted By Anachron
Also interesting to see how J.L.C. asked for people to answer what vaccines meet the criteria that he couldn't, up to this point, after multiple request, clearly define.

Still lulzy tho

It's much easier to deflect, bend the perceived metrics, and move the goalposts to 'win' an argument when nothing is defined....
post 1697197283 01-30-2024, 04:15 PM
-
#95
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920
It's much easier to deflect, bend the perceived metrics, and move the goalposts to 'win' an argument when nothing is defined....
Are you willing to suggest any candidate vaccines that meet the requirements?
post 1697198453 01-30-2024, 04:36 PM
-
#96
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron
Are you willing to define the requirements that people would suggest candidates for?

Still lulzy tho

5-10 years of safety data after phase 3 trial completion, prior to approval

100% effectiveness in post market surveillance

No adverse events following vaccination

Meeting "real" vaccine definitions. We need Paul here as the definition guy.
post 1697198803 01-30-2024, 04:41 PM
-
#97
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron
Still very vague.

Let's start by defining "prior to approval", which you have already refused to define the past two times I requested it. Once you do that, we can go down the list one by one to clarify the your requirements to be met.

Thanks for keeping it lulzy though

FDA approval
post 1697199153 01-30-2024, 04:46 PM
-
#98
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron
Interesting.

Was not aware that beavercels were under FDA jurisdiction, but let's go with that.

Now, let's define "100% effectiveness".

Still lulzy tho

Which vaccines meet the criteria?
post 1697199343 01-30-2024, 04:50 PM
-
#99
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron
Interesting how you are refusing to define the very criteria your question is based on.

So let me repeat the question, how do you define "100% effectiveness"?

Thanks for keeping lulzy

Definite it however you want and propose some candidates that meet the criterion. That's what we're discussing, right?
post 1697199733 01-30-2024, 04:58 PM
-
#100
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Anachron
No.

You asked people to provide vaccines that they think meet your criteria, but you refuse the define the criteria.

If the criteria is not defined, how can people suggest vaccines that meet said criteria?

I literally had to ask three times just to clarify that you meant "prior to approval", now you are refusing to define what you mean by "100% effectiveness".

Thanks for keeping it lulzy

Which vaccines are misc-accepted?

Dare to provide a position?
post 1697199983 01-30-2024, 05:04 PM
-
#101
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920
Just like there were a lot of unknowns about the vaccine side effects. To belittle people for their personal choice to avoid new vaccine with no track record is very ****ty and anti choice of you.
And he didn't even get the booster shots.
post 1697200013 01-30-2024, 05:05 PM
-
#102
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By x-trainer
Do the traditional rules change at all..... when people are dying like flies in Italy and New York City and something is a new or novel killer?
Asking for a friend?
And did the Obama *emergency response book* say anything about special circumstances and pandemics?
Christ, this ****ing bitch always brings up Italy and NYC......
post 1697200053 01-30-2024, 05:06 PM
-
#103
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Anachron
So they went and stayed in the unheated garage even though no one else was at home?

Mental illness at its finest.
Sounds like a crime to me, and why does he keep trying to justify it? Where did this guy even use the bathroom? Or did they give him a bucket? How did he bathe?
post 1697200123 01-30-2024, 05:08 PM
-
#104
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Which vaccines meet the misc "proven" criterion prior to approval?
Maybe something that wasn't created in 9 months? Where people took it the wrong way for over a year?
post 1697200313 01-30-2024, 05:12 PM
-
#105
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Do these posts help?
Originally Posted By Anachron
How can I offer a position on something you refuse to define?

What is a "misc-accepted vaccine"?

Thanks for keeping it lulzy

Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Covid vaccines got an EUA,

That is one of the reasons skeptics use to reject.

I'm just asking which vacccines (because skeptics are only opposed to covid vaccines) meet the implied criterion:

- long term data
- 10 years of safety dataafterphase 3 trials,beforeapproval

- Effectiveness
- only vaccines with 100% effectiveness arerealvaccines
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
5-10 years of safety data after phase 3 trial completion, prior to approval

100% effectiveness in post market surveillance

No adverse events following vaccination

Meeting "real" vaccine definitions. We need Paul here as the definition guy.
post 1697200433 01-30-2024, 05:15 PM
-
#106
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Not many people will read the thread, but that’s ok. Many will just read the original post and be reminded of some of the absolute horsesh!t that was fed to people, which is good enough.


We also blatantly fake hospital photos(taken from different times, places and situations than the one they were attributed to)

99% of hospitalized are unvaccinated(just lmao)

Govt. agencies insisting anyone taking ivermectin must think they’re a horse.

Fauci saying that vaccinated people, for all intents and purposes, become dead ends for the virus so that it can’t spread and/or mutate.

Govt. overreach and bike rallies being super spread events which killed untold amounts of grandmas, while the mostly peaceful BLM protests actually reduced spread.

Lab leak hypothesis is an insane, far-right conspiracy theory.



And those are just a handful from a list that goes on and on and on and on. Just lmfao at anyone who pretends “oh we were just doing the best we could”. No, they blatantly pissed all over the country while telling us it was raining and treated the entire population like retards(and unfortunately they were half right).
post 1697200663 01-30-2024, 05:20 PM
-
#107
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
Not many people will read the thread, but that’s ok. Many will just read the original post and be reminded of some of the absolute horsesh!t that was fed to people, which is good enough.


We also blatantly fake hospital photos(taken from different times, places and situations than the one they were attributed to)

99% of hospitalized are unvaccinated(just lmao)

Govt. agencies insisting anyone taking ivermectin must think they’re a horse.

Fauci saying that vaccinated people, for all intents and purposes, become dead ends for the virus so that it can’t spread and/or mutate.

Govt. overreach and bike rallies being super spread events which killed untold amounts of grandmas, while the mostly peaceful BLM protests actually reduced spread.

Lab leak hypothesis is an insane, far-right conspiracy theory.



And those are just a handful from a list that goes on and on and on and on. Just lmfao at anyone who pretends “oh we were just doing the best we could”. No, they blatantly pissed all over the country while telling us it was raining and treated the entire population like retards(and unfortunately they were half right).
And nobody was found culpable. In fact, majority of people who placed the most restrictions on their state and city were reelected.

You forgot that the last words of the unvaccinated being, "Can I still get the jab?"

And the doctor/nurse replying, "I'm sorry, it's too late....."
post 1697200833 01-30-2024, 05:25 PM
-
#108
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
Not many people will read the thread, but that’s ok. Many will just read the original post and be reminded of some of the absolute horsesh!t that was fed to people, which is good enough.


We also blatantly fake hospital photos(taken from different times, places and situations than the one they were attributed to)

99% of hospitalized are unvaccinated(just lmao)

Govt. agencies insisting anyone taking ivermectin must think they’re a horse.

Fauci saying that vaccinated people, for all intents and purposes, become dead ends for the virus so that it can’t spread and/or mutate.

Govt. overreach and bike rallies being super spread events which killed untold amounts of grandmas, while the mostly peaceful BLM protests actually reduced spread.

Lab leak hypothesis is an insane, far-right conspiracy theory.



And those are just a handful from a list that goes on and on and on and on. Just lmfao at anyone who pretends “oh we were just doing the best we could”. No, they blatantly pissed all over the country while telling us it was raining and treated the entire population like retards(and unfortunately they were half right).
Media took/take advantage of a divisive topic?

With that, I agree
post 1697201623 01-30-2024, 05:39 PM
-
#109
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  2. Join Date: Feb 2003
  3. Posts: 63,701
  4. Rep Power: 567256
Originally Posted By Anachron
And the medical community supported it all along the way.
That part isn't lulzy though.
post 1697202583 01-30-2024, 05:56 PM
-
#110
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By Polaris
That part isn't lulzy though.
Sh!t….what are you taking about? This is hilarious:
























This kind of stuff wasn’t so funny though.


post 1697203533 01-30-2024, 06:21 PM
-
#111
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 41,691
  6. Rep Power: 169649
I honestly feel bad for jabbies. Brb new vaccine is 'Safe AND effective.' Brb you can still get sick, still get hospitalized, and still even die after vaccinated. BUT it supposedly lowers the severity of the sickness. What came after that? Brb the vaccine is safe AND effective. But its only effective for a short amount of time. So you need to get 'boosters' periodically to stay 'up to date'. Brb the vaccine is safe and effective. But its ONLY effective for previous strains of covid...

So what happens after you've received your jabs, over and over again, and survived the pandemic? Surely only vaccinated and boosted people are left alive? Oh, wait, 99.9% of unvaxed people are still here and are doing just fine.





My personal doctor tried to shill the vaccine to me for years and I refused to get it. He finally admitted to me recently he was wrong. He regrets getting the vax and two boosters. And he regrets encouraging anyone else to get it. Said after reading all of the studies/literature around it. He'd actively recommend against getting it. Due to potential for risks/complications. The same risks/complications the media, big pharma and government promised us did not exist. Because it was 'Safe and effective'.
post 1697203673 01-30-2024, 06:24 PM
-
#112
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By guest89
I honestly feel bad for jabbies. Brb new vaccine is 'Safe AND effective.' Brb you can still get sick, still get hospitalized, and still even die after vaccinated. BUT it supposedly lowers the severity of the sickness. What came after that? Brb the vaccine is safe AND effective. But its only effective for a short amount of time. So you need to get 'boosters' periodically to stay 'up to date'. Brb the vaccine is safe and effective. But its ONLY effective for previous strains of covid...
Do you think that's markedly different from other vaccines to which people aren't opposed?
post 1697203893 01-30-2024, 06:27 PM
-
#113
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  2. Join Date: Mar 2010
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 33,185
  5. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By guest89
I honestly feel bad for jabbies. Brb new vaccine is 'Safe AND effective.' Brb you can still get sick, still get hospitalized, and still even die after vaccinated. BUT it supposedly lowers the severity of the sickness. What came after that? Brb the vaccine is safe AND effective. But its only effective for a short amount of time. So you need to get 'boosters' periodically to stay 'up to date'. Brb the vaccine is safe and effective. But its ONLY effective for previous strains of covid...

So what happens after you've received your jabs, over and over again, and survived the pandemic? Surely only vaccinated and boosted people are left alive? Oh, wait, 99.9% of unvaxed people are still here and are doing just fine.





My personal doctor tried to shill the vaccine to me for years and I refused to get it. He finally admitted to me recently he was wrong. He regrets getting the vax and two boosters. And he regrets encouraging anyone else to get it. Said after reading all of the studies/literature around it. He'd actively recommend against getting it. Due to potential for risks/complications. The same risks/complications the media, big pharma and government promised us did not exist. Because it was 'Safe and effective'.
Yeah my doctor told me I don’t need it as well. Sad that your doctor pumped that sh!t out for so long though, but now at least he realizes he was wrong and has changed his ways.
post 1697204323 01-30-2024, 07:38 PM
-
#114
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  2. Join Date: Aug 2015
  3. Posts: 16,256
  4. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Do you think that's markedly different from other vaccines to which people aren't opposed?
Which other vaccines are people not opposed to?

Which people are we talking about?

Still providing the lulz I see

post 1697204483 01-30-2024, 06:41 PM
-
#115
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 41,691
  6. Rep Power: 169649
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Do you think that's markedly different from other vaccines to which people aren't opposed?
I think the majority of vaccines are complete bull****. But aside from the 'flu shot'. I've never heard of a vaccine being widely administered that is completely ineffective at protecting you against the thing its supposed to.

The fact that big pharma companies are constantly advertising new vaccines to treat various minor issues is hilarious. Its even funnier then these same companies have settled with hundreds of millions/billions of dollars in lawsuits for harm they've caused.


But my biggest problem with the covid vaccine was the massive campaign which was completely based on lies and misinformation. Anyone who wasn't mentally retarded knows a standard surgical mask or cloth mask wouldn't give a person any amount of protection. Yet everyone still campaigned for masks like idiots. Anyone who wasn't an idiot knew 'social distancing' and staying six feet apart was completely stupid. And guess what. Fauci your lord and savior just admitted there was no science behind it. It just looked good telling people to do that. And anyone who knows anything about experimental substances and isn't a complete idiot would know that there was no real way they could know the vaccine would be 'safe and effective' over a long period of time. It was all guesswork and wishful thinking.



History will remember the pandemic as the time when government officials and media told people a bunch of random **** that didn't make any sense. And a large portion of people believed it and complied because they were afraid. And a large portion of 'medical professionals' are basically idiots that just believe whatever they are told.
post 1697205353 01-30-2024, 06:59 PM
-
#116
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By guest89
I think the majority of vaccines are complete bull****.
This is a position I can appreciaterepped

post 1697206643 01-30-2024, 07:29 PM
-
#117
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010
Sh!t….what are you taking about? This is hilarious:
























This kind of stuff wasn’t so funny though.


What's with the second video??? Forgive and forget!!! Why do you caaaaaaaaaaaare???
post 1697206733 01-30-2024, 07:31 PM
-
#118
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Do you think that's markedly different from other vaccines to which people aren't opposed?
So I take it you got the RSV jab, flu shot, Pneumococcal shot, Shingles vaccine?
post 1697206923 01-30-2024, 07:36 PM
-
#119
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
So I take it you got the RSV jab, flu shot, Pneumococcal shot, Shingles vaccine?
Are they all 100% effective with zero risk of adverse effects?
post 1697207013 01-30-2024, 08:37 PM
-
#120
  1. Anachron
  1. Anachron
  2. Join Date: Aug 2015
  3. Posts: 16,256
  4. Rep Power: 684578
Originally Posted By J.L.C.
Are they all 100% effective with zero risk of adverse effects?
You have yet to define what you mean by "100% effective".

You have refused to define at least three times already.

Why is that?

Still lulzy tho

Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts