Forum
»
Given the facts about evolution, we should be able to replicate it with , proof*
- Results 1 to 30 of 30
-
Page 1 of 1
02-05-2024, 01:05 PM
-
#1
- Condo41
- Registered User
-
- Condo41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,651
- Rep Power: 80918
-
-
Given the facts about evolution, we should be able to replicate it with , proof*
Homosapiens evolved from homo erectus (lol erect)
Oldest homo erectus is 1.5 million years old (Google > nhm.ac.uk)
Oldest homosapien is 500K years old (google > nhm.ac.uk)
It took roughly 1 million years for homo erectus to branch species into something else.
Let's call a generation 20 years. Humans don't have babies at 80 years old they do it at 18-23. So 20 years is a generation.
In 1 million years, you have 50,000 generations.
50k generations to create a new species. Agree? Yes. Not debatable. Ok.
Ok...moving on to my point.
A house fly begins to reproduce at 48hours.
So, 1 generation of a house fly is 48hours.
We'd need 273 years to get 50k generations.
There exist bacteria with a generation reproduction span of just 10 minutes. We would need less than a year to get 50k generations out of that.
We SHOULD be able to begin an evolution experiment with the house fly that seeks to evolve them into a new species in just 275 years. And we SHOULD be able to see a complete evolution of bacteria in less than 1 year.
Oldest homo erectus is 1.5 million years old (Google > nhm.ac.uk)
Oldest homosapien is 500K years old (google > nhm.ac.uk)
It took roughly 1 million years for homo erectus to branch species into something else.
Let's call a generation 20 years. Humans don't have babies at 80 years old they do it at 18-23. So 20 years is a generation.
In 1 million years, you have 50,000 generations.
50k generations to create a new species. Agree? Yes. Not debatable. Ok.
Ok...moving on to my point.
A house fly begins to reproduce at 48hours.
So, 1 generation of a house fly is 48hours.
We'd need 273 years to get 50k generations.
There exist bacteria with a generation reproduction span of just 10 minutes. We would need less than a year to get 50k generations out of that.
We SHOULD be able to begin an evolution experiment with the house fly that seeks to evolve them into a new species in just 275 years. And we SHOULD be able to see a complete evolution of bacteria in less than 1 year.
02-05-2024, 01:09 PM
-
#2
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
We are watching it now with all of the stupid people breeding and look what's happening to society.
Some say we came from apes, but obvious clues show that's the final form.
Some say we came from apes, but obvious clues show that's the final form.
02-05-2024, 01:21 PM
-
#3
02-05-2024, 01:40 PM
-
#4
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
-
- r32gojirra
- Registered NEET
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: East Coast, Australia
- Posts: 39,473
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 592342
-
-
Not true
Darwin posits that inferior mutations will be selected out (die) from the gene pool
Things like vaccines, eye glasses, antibiotics, autism awareness etc prevent that happening
Just look at the misc
Darwin posits that inferior mutations will be selected out (die) from the gene pool
Things like vaccines, eye glasses, antibiotics, autism awareness etc prevent that happening
Just look at the misc
02-05-2024, 01:43 PM
-
#5
- ithappenss
- Registered User
-
- ithappenss
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,765
- Rep Power: 12553
-
-
"erectus likely went extinct due to climate change"
full circle. didnt pay their carbon tax
full circle. didnt pay their carbon tax
02-05-2024, 01:44 PM
-
#6
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
OP doesn't believe in evolution???
02-05-2024, 01:57 PM
-
#7
02-05-2024, 02:12 PM
-
#8
- skunkshark
- Registered User
-
- skunkshark
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2017
- Location: United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 557
- Rep Power: 4382
-
-
Originally Posted By r32gojirra⏩
That's genetics, only half of evolution. Evolution says everything came from simple lifeforms by chance. When things reproduce and traits are selected out, you are losing genetic information not gaining. OP wants an example of things gaining genetic information over time.Not true
Darwin posits that inferior mutations will be selected out (die) from the gene pool
Darwin posits that inferior mutations will be selected out (die) from the gene pool
02-05-2024, 02:24 PM
-
#9
02-05-2024, 06:28 PM
-
#10
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
You do know that dogs have evolved to have facial expressions?
02-05-2024, 10:27 PM
-
#11
- MeSoHawny
- Registered User
-
- MeSoHawny
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2023
- Age: 56
- Posts: 5,689
- Rep Power: 40205
-
-
Originally Posted By Condo41⏩
You do all the time, look at how viruses mutate.We SHOULD be able to begin an evolution experiment with the house fly that seeks to evolve them into a new species in just 275 years. And we SHOULD be able to see a complete evolution of bacteria in less than 1 year.
02-05-2024, 11:31 PM
-
#12
- bsrkoacar2
- Registered User
-
- bsrkoacar2
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 16,614
- Rep Power: 113438
-
-
I think the concept of evolution makes sense. That said, I don't think people have any kind of grasp on science and especially paleontology. Scientists have massive egos and will use mental gymnastics to make whatever evidence they have fit their agenda. They could find a fossil millions of years older than what's known and claim it's coincidence or some bs.
Want to see an example? Look into the Alaskan "boneyard." He finds all kinds of chit from the last ice age like dire wolves and sabertooth tiger skulls in a 2 acre plot of land on his private gold mine. Those animals were never known to be in Alaska at that time. Since he found them, they obviously were, but colleges will straight up deny they ever lived there just cause it isn't in the text books their professors wrote. It's strange.
Want to see an example? Look into the Alaskan "boneyard." He finds all kinds of chit from the last ice age like dire wolves and sabertooth tiger skulls in a 2 acre plot of land on his private gold mine. Those animals were never known to be in Alaska at that time. Since he found them, they obviously were, but colleges will straight up deny they ever lived there just cause it isn't in the text books their professors wrote. It's strange.
02-05-2024, 11:45 PM
-
#13
- mulletwarrior
- Registered User
-
- mulletwarrior
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Age: 41
- Posts: 13,586
- Rep Power: 99233
-
-
Does not believing in evolution get ppl on a list, fed brah?
To answer your dumbass question, they already did this like 200 yrs on Galapagos island with butterflies.
And it happens all the time. Recent example off the top of my head: it is becoming quite common for rattlesnakes to not have working rattles. Why? Because the ones that rattle would get discovered and killed, whereas the ones with rattles that dont work have a better chance of not being detected.
To answer your dumbass question, they already did this like 200 yrs on Galapagos island with butterflies.
And it happens all the time. Recent example off the top of my head: it is becoming quite common for rattlesnakes to not have working rattles. Why? Because the ones that rattle would get discovered and killed, whereas the ones with rattles that dont work have a better chance of not being detected.
mo e
02-06-2024, 04:10 AM
-
#14
- Ratfish
- Join Date: Jul 2009
- Location: Portland, Oregon, United States
- Posts: 113,850
- Rep Power: 576095
-
-
Originally Posted By mulletwarrior⏩
ha, gay as hell to be demoted from rattlesnake to just snakeDoes not believing in evolution get ppl on a list, fed brah?
To answer your dumbass question, they already did this like 200 yrs on Galapagos island with butterflies.
And it happens all the time. Recent example off the top of my head: it is becoming quite common for rattlesnakes to not have working rattles. Why? Because the ones that rattle would get discovered and killed, whereas the ones with rattles that dont work have a better chance of not being detected.
To answer your dumbass question, they already did this like 200 yrs on Galapagos island with butterflies.
And it happens all the time. Recent example off the top of my head: it is becoming quite common for rattlesnakes to not have working rattles. Why? Because the ones that rattle would get discovered and killed, whereas the ones with rattles that dont work have a better chance of not being detected.
Make Europe Germany Again
02-06-2024, 04:20 AM
-
#15
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
-
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Age: 32
- Posts: 2,043
- Rep Power: 17847
-
-
Originally Posted By skunkshark⏩
LMAO - not even wrong. Were you homeschooled brah?That's genetics, only half of evolution. Evolution says everything came from simple lifeforms by chance. When things reproduce and traits are selected out, you are losing genetic information not gaining. OP wants an example of things gaining genetic information over time.
Pittsburgh Penguins 5x Stanley Cup Champions
AMG Petronas 9x Drivers' Championships, 7x Constructors' Championship
02-06-2024, 04:31 AM
-
#16
- Narrator02
- Registered User
-
- Narrator02
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2020
- Age: 56
- Posts: 2,315
- Rep Power: 34757
-
-
How else would we have evolved if not for evolution? Hopefully you aren't thinking we were made 2,000 years ago by a mythical man in the sky? Which theory is more plausible?
02-06-2024, 04:44 AM
-
#17
02-06-2024, 04:45 AM
-
#18
- jtaylor2010
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,185
- Rep Power: 441422
-
-
Originally Posted By Narrator02⏩
Well simulation theory doesn’t require evolution.How else would we have evolved if not for evolution? Hopefully you aren't thinking we were made 2,000 years ago by a mythical man in the sky? Which theory is more plausible?
02-06-2024, 07:34 AM
-
#19
- Condo41
- Registered User
-
- Condo41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,651
- Rep Power: 80918
-
-
Originally Posted By mulletwarrior⏩
That isn't evolution. Evolution requires a new species with added genetic information. You're talking about something else.Does not believing in evolution get ppl on a list, fed brah?
To answer your dumbass question, they already did this like 200 yrs on Galapagos island with butterflies.
And it happens all the time. Recent example off the top of my head: it is becoming quite common for rattlesnakes to not have working rattles. Why? Because the ones that rattle would get discovered and killed, whereas the ones with rattles that dont work have a better chance of not being detected.
To answer your dumbass question, they already did this like 200 yrs on Galapagos island with butterflies.
And it happens all the time. Recent example off the top of my head: it is becoming quite common for rattlesnakes to not have working rattles. Why? Because the ones that rattle would get discovered and killed, whereas the ones with rattles that dont work have a better chance of not being detected.
Mutations only ever omit info, never add to it.
I'd like to see genetic info added. Mutations NEVER amount to evolution because Mutations ALWAYS delete genetic data, every. Single. Time
02-06-2024, 07:37 AM
-
#20
02-06-2024, 07:40 AM
-
#21
02-06-2024, 07:51 AM
-
#22
02-06-2024, 07:55 AM
-
#23
- mulletwarrior
- Registered User
-
- mulletwarrior
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2013
- Age: 41
- Posts: 13,586
- Rep Power: 99233
-
-
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
lol I’m going to call them a ******* next time I see one of thenha, gay as hell to be demoted from rattlesnake to just snake
mo e
02-06-2024, 08:03 AM
-
#24
- elterrible987
- Banned
-
- elterrible987
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Posts: 51,859
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By baldbrah⏩
yeah they can tell peoples race from the skeleton, when they find a dead skeleton they will know what race it was and male or female. That basically destroys the view that "race is just a social construct". but there isnt any real research into races and species because science has been politicized for many decades now. Any scientist trying to study it will get blacklisted and no grants approved.It's still happening. Takes a bit for a new species to completely separate.

02-06-2024, 08:17 AM
-
#25
02-06-2024, 08:48 AM
-
#26
02-06-2024, 09:00 AM
-
#27
- skunkshark
- Registered User
-
- skunkshark
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2017
- Location: United States
- Age: 35
- Posts: 557
- Rep Power: 4382
-
-
Originally Posted By Condo41⏩
IDK if mutations only ever delete genetic data. Isn't something like downs syndrome caused by extra genetic info (chromosome)? But trait selection via reproduction is the loss of genetic info and it's what everyone thinks is evolution, but it's basically the opposite of evolution.That isn't evolution. Evolution requires a new species with added genetic information. You're talking about something else.
Mutations only ever omit info, never add to it.
I'd like to see genetic info added. Mutations NEVER amount to evolution because Mutations ALWAYS delete genetic data, every. Single. Time
Mutations only ever omit info, never add to it.
I'd like to see genetic info added. Mutations NEVER amount to evolution because Mutations ALWAYS delete genetic data, every. Single. Time
02-06-2024, 09:11 AM
-
#28
- Condo41
- Registered User
-
- Condo41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,651
- Rep Power: 80918
-
-
Originally Posted By pimpinyogirl⏩
I have. Not just 1 either. I was in line to be a vet before I changed out to an MBA.Have you ever considered taking a university course in Evolution, OP? You'd probably learn a fair bit from one.
Where do you think these questions come from?
Most people don't understand the theory of evolution, and there seems to be a 33% / 33% / 33% split on how it works. Even virgin evolution believers can't agree amongst eachother what it is.
Gradual change over time
No no no it's a sudden mutation
*teleports behind you* *whispers* fools, it's a sudden speciecide where only a few of the remainder survive
None of you agree.
02-06-2024, 03:05 PM
-
#29
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
-
- teodorkanev1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2014
- Age: 32
- Posts: 2,043
- Rep Power: 17847
-
-
Originally Posted By Condo41⏩
That's a strawman and clearly you don't understand wtf you're talking about. What do you mean mutations never amount to evolution? Genetic drift is one of the main mechanisms behind biodiversity.That isn't evolution. Evolution requires a new species with added genetic information. You're talking about something else.
Mutations only ever omit info, never add to it.
I'd like to see genetic info added. Mutations NEVER amount to evolution because Mutations ALWAYS delete genetic data, every. Single. Time
Mutations only ever omit info, never add to it.
I'd like to see genetic info added. Mutations NEVER amount to evolution because Mutations ALWAYS delete genetic data, every. Single. Time
Pittsburgh Penguins 5x Stanley Cup Champions
AMG Petronas 9x Drivers' Championships, 7x Constructors' Championship
02-06-2024, 03:07 PM
-
#30
- Condo41
- Registered User
-
- Condo41
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,651
- Rep Power: 80918
-
-
Originally Posted By teodorkanev1⏩
what i mean by mutations never amount to evolution is very simply this:...That's a strawman and clearly you don't understand wtf you're talking about. What do you mean mutations never amount to evolution? Genetic drift is one of the main mechanisms behind biodiversity.
Mutations do not add genetic information. Mutations are ONLY missing genetic information. Period.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts