Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees To Remove Controversial 'Stop It' Post
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 63
  2. Page 1 of 3
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  7. Last

Thread: FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees To Remove Controversial 'Stop It' Post

post 1699595433 03-23-2024, 06:45 AM
-
#1
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793

FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees To Remove Controversial 'Stop It' Post

FDA Settles Ivermectin Case, Agrees To Remove Controversial 'Stop It' Post
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...ref=biztoc.com

Trigger Warning:Right-wing news outlet

I did try to source this from a more neutral news site, could not find one. All Epoch Times or Zerohedge, so if that is a problem then okay. No need to get irate or obnoxious about it, although if you can source somehow this is untrue that would be great.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1699595743 03-23-2024, 06:54 AM
-
#2
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 8,412
  6. Rep Power: 55161
In before the AI algorithm known as J.L.C.
"The reason we are being murdered with genetic altering drugs is its slow acting and it causes your body to malfunction and destroy itself so there is a "plausible deniability" factor. Unlike most poisons which leave more evidence of being the direct cause of death."

1,151+ pages of peoples accounts of Covid-19 vaccine damage:
https://vestibular.org/forum/dizziness/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
post 1699595793 03-23-2024, 06:55 AM
-
#3
  1. PaulJerome
  2. Zealot from the housetops
  1. PaulJerome
  2. Zealot from the housetops
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 3,410
  5. Rep Power: 54695
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-co...ctin-order.pdf
6'5" 210 lbs, 10.9% body fat

Disagree with me, fine; but before calling me a fraudster click: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=185252663

Bodily exercise profits a little, but godliness is profitable unto all things.
post 1699595903 03-23-2024, 06:58 AM
-
#4
  1. JayJ350
  1. JayJ350
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 73,290
  7. Rep Power: 273505
MSM is eerily silent
post 1699596043 03-23-2024, 07:03 AM
-
#5
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By JayJ350⏩
MSM is eerily silent
Yeah.

I could only find right wing outlets to talk about this -- which, I am not trying to say right wing sources are any paragons of truth or integrity, just that the MSM won't touch this story, which appears to be truthful but disrupts the narrative they were all too complicit in crafting back in the day.

Almost as if it's hard to know what's going on in the world, if you only listen to a single source of information and instantly dismiss all others?

edit: And to be clear, goes both ways. I don't expect to get fair, if any, coverage of Kushner being involved in shady ass deals with SA from Epoch Times, etc...
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1699596453 03-23-2024, 07:15 AM
-
#6
  1. ~Hades~
  2. True Patriot Crew
  1. ~Hades~
  2. True Patriot Crew
  3. Join Date: Dec 2007
  4. Posts: 26,187
  5. Rep Power: 695527
Originally Posted By JayJ350⏩
MSM is eerily silent
That’s how it goes with anything contrary to the narrative. Just don’t report on it.
Royal Crew
Chiefs Crew
Festivus Cew
post 1699596743 03-23-2024, 07:25 AM
-
#7
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
An Asian friend told me that in his home country, they do a yearly de worning process using ivermectin because of foods and raw fish being tainted with pests.

As for here, now in 2024, I am not sure how popular this stuff is anymore as 90% of the folks that I know( R and D) stopped talking about COVID-19.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1699596993 03-23-2024, 07:31 AM
-
#8
  1. TCmaxxing
  2. Registered User
  1. TCmaxxing
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 5,806
  6. Rep Power: 29036
Why need to explain? Zerohedge and Epoch spits more truths than CNN and msnbc
post 1699597343 03-23-2024, 07:42 AM
-
#9
  1. -JR
  2. Not Joe Rogan
  1. -JR
  2. Not Joe Rogan
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Posts: 6,032
  5. Rep Power: 43118
Bit late...
-Virtue is its own reward

-Survived misc outage 2022 crew
-My old username (Johnez) did not survive outage :-(
post 1699600003 03-23-2024, 08:51 AM
-
#10
  1. r0bo
  2. hi friend
  1. r0bo
  2. hi friend
  3. Join Date: Mar 2007
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 9,257
  6. Rep Power: 78322
Ivermectin still doesn't treat COVID lmao
post 1699600223 03-23-2024, 08:56 AM
-
#11
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By r0bo⏩
Ivermectin still doesn't treat COVID lmao
Maybe not, but the narrative it is dangerous and killing people or that it's horse medicine, the one the MSM and so-called health officials colluded with Government to demand, and anyone who said it wasn't dangerous was silenced/censored, that narrative has collapsed.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1699600343 03-23-2024, 09:00 AM
-
#12
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By r0bo⏩
Ivermectin still doesn't treat COVID lmao
You must hate living in Florida, and despise how DeSantis handled it.
post 1699600503 03-23-2024, 09:03 AM
-
#13
  1. r0bo
  2. hi friend
  1. r0bo
  2. hi friend
  3. Join Date: Mar 2007
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 9,257
  6. Rep Power: 78322
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
You must hate living in Florida, and despise how DeSantis handled it.
Nah he had no bearing on how I practiced. I denied every Rx sent to me for it
post 1699600693 03-23-2024, 09:07 AM
-
#14
  1. r0bo
  2. hi friend
  1. r0bo
  2. hi friend
  3. Join Date: Mar 2007
  4. Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 9,257
  6. Rep Power: 78322
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Maybe not, but the narrative it is dangerous and killing people or that it's horse medicine, the one the MSM and so-called health officials colluded with Government to demand, and anyone who said it wasn't dangerous was silenced/censored, that narrative has collapsed.
The narrative was to stop people using veterinary preparations of ivermectin, which people were doing .
post 1699600883 03-23-2024, 09:12 AM
-
#15
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By r0bo⏩
The narrative was to stop people using veterinary preparations of ivermectin, which people were doing .
Which is why when a doctor wrote a prescription for it to their HUMAN patient you refused to fill it…


Despite the fact that it is known to be extremely safe and an effective treatment in helping with tons of different viruses.
post 1699600993 03-23-2024, 09:15 AM
-
#16
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By r0bo⏩
Nah he had no bearing on how I practiced. I denied every Rx sent to me for it
So how many masks did you go through? How many jabs did you get?
post 1699601123 03-23-2024, 09:20 AM
-
#17
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By r0bo⏩
The narrative was to stop people using veterinary preparations of ivermectin, which people were doing .
I strongly disagree and consider attempts to say what you just did as gaslighting, trying to walk back what it was.

No, they never said, "Ivermectin may or may not work and nothing shows that it does, please only use it with a prescription" and left it at that. Never did that -- they said it was all horse medicine, they mocked people like Joe Rogan who got a prescription for it, many pharmacies would not honor the (Doctor prescribed human-grade) prescriptions for it and such. Anyone who figured it didn't hurt, might as well try human-grade ivermectin, they were attacked, censored, silenced and/or demonized.

Just say what it was and be fair. You can think some people jumped to wild conclusions about it working curing covid. Yes, many people did and I won't knock that opinion but don't try and pretend that the other side of the coin did not completely and utterly overstep things and took a very authoritarian stance on it, either.

btw, on the animal grade stuff, while I do not recommend anyone take anything meant for beasts, it's not like here at bb.com some guys haven't stuck needles in their butt taken from a bottle with a chicken on it or anything. Other than taking way too much, it's not like it was some horrible terrible death-sentence health risk that needed a hard shutdown with collusion from Government, media, entertainment and such to crack down on like it was crack that gave you AIDS, either.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1699601533 03-23-2024, 09:32 AM
-
#18
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
I strongly disagree and consider attempts to say what you just did as gaslighting, trying to walk back what it was.

No, they never said, "Ivermectin may or may not work and nothing shows that it does, please only use it with a prescription" and left it at that. Never did that -- they said it was all horse medicine, they mocked people like Joe Rogan who got a prescription for it, many pharmacies would not honor the (Doctor prescribed human-grade) prescriptions for it and such. Anyone who figured it didn't hurt, might as well try human-grade ivermectin, they were attacked, censored, silenced and/or demonized.

Just say what it was and be fair. You can think some people jumped to wild conclusions about it working curing covid. Yes, many people did and I won't knock that opinion but don't try and pretend that the other side of the coin did not completely and utterly overstep things and took a very authoritarian stance on it, either.

btw, on the animal grade stuff, while I do not recommend anyone take anything meant for beasts, it's not like here at bb.com some guys haven't stuck needles in their butt taken from a bottle with a chicken on it or anything. Other than taking way too much, it's not like it was some horrible terrible death-sentence health risk that needed a hard shutdown with collusion from Government, media, entertainment and such to crack down on like it was crack that gave you AIDS, either.
Always on spread from quality post like this.



And the same people like Robo, refused to fill prescriptions for something with an extensive history of being used safely and effectively billions of times to treat viral infections….while also telling people to get injected with a drug which had no long term studies in a form that has never been used to safely and effectively deliver any kind of treatment(and in a form known to introduce many risks).




Brainwashedcels gonna brainwashcel
post 1699602093 03-23-2024, 09:43 AM
-
#19
  1. yabbayabba
  1. yabbayabba
  3. Join Date: Jun 2005
  4. Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
  5. Posts: 19,040
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 157908
Originally Posted By r0bo⏩
Ivermectin still doesn't treat COVID lmao
Imagine not caring the government lied to you.
Originally Posted By r0bo⏩
Nah he had no bearing on how I practiced. I denied every Rx sent to me for it
Makes sense now, you blindly do what daddy government tells you to do. And then throw in some gaslighting for good measure.

Typical leftard NPC.
post 1699603743 03-23-2024, 10:29 AM
-
#20
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

It's still not an effective treatment for COVID-19
post 1699607193 03-23-2024, 11:52 AM
-
#21
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19

https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19

It's still not an effective treatment for COVID-19
And concerning this settlement, the FDA just didn't think it was worth the expense to fight just to keep four years old posts up.

None of this changes the FDA's position concerning using Ivermectin to treat Covid.
post 1699607333 03-23-2024, 11:55 AM
-
#22
  1. jtaylor2010
  1. jtaylor2010
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,185
  6. Rep Power: 441422
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
And concerning this settlement, the FDA just didn't think it was worth the expense to fight just to keep four years old posts up.

None of this changes the FDA's position concerning using Ivermectin to treat Covid.
The same FDA that says you should inject your 1 year old baby with mRNA injections??
post 1699607793 03-23-2024, 12:03 PM
-
#23
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
And concerning this settlement, the FDA just didn't think it was worth the expense to fight just to keep four years old posts up.

None of this changes the FDA's position concerning using Ivermectin to treat Covid.
Originally Posted By FDA
Here’s What You Need to Know about Ivermectin
The FDA has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19 in humans or animals. Ivermectin is approved for human use to treat infections caused by some parasitic worms and head lice and skin conditions like rosacea.
Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.
Taking large doses of ivermectin is dangerous.
If your health care provider writes you an ivermectin prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed.
Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous.
Already stated this, and not saying you presumed otherwise, but just re-stating for clarity: I have no issue with these recommendations.

What bothered me was the organized propaganda against Ivermectin. Not that it had not been shown to be effective, or that you should only use human-grade drugs, that only take it with prescriptions, etc... that is all fine, well and good.

It's this kind of thing, also from the FDA:

Or the attacks on Joe Rogan, who only took it as part of a litany of safe doctor-prescribed drugs (and infuriated CNN by recovering quickly), where they doctored photos of him looking sickly, ran stories propagandizing against him - and everyone else who contributed to a narrative that ivermectin was not safe, was for animals and where pharmacies wouldn't even fill doctor's prescriptions for it.

I don't know how apart someone like you, r0bo or JLC even are from this stance, I don't think all that much, beyond not thinking it's as important or as big a deal as I do. Which is fine. You don't have to, no more than I need to get up in arms about specific problems you might care more about. I don't think any of you are vegan or big animal right activists, but let's say someone is: I don't have to feel as passionately about their cause as they do and give up meat, but at the same time I can see footage of what goes on in slaughterhouses and find common ground that it's immoral.

It's okay to find common ground with people, it's the first step to any solution. Not that any of us are going to solve anything, but at the least it might help us understand things from each other's perspectives more. Versus going out of our way to ensure we find no common ground with someone we disagree with.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1699610103 03-23-2024, 01:02 PM
-
#24
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
And concerning this settlement, the FDA just didn't think it was worth the expense to fight just to keep four years old posts up.

None of this changes the FDA's position concerning using Ivermectin to treat Covid.
The FDA is all knowing, and never approved anything that was later recalled.
post 1699638843 03-24-2024, 07:26 AM
-
#25
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By jtaylor2010⏩
The same FDA that says you should inject your 1 year old baby with mRNA injections??
Among other vaccines, yes.
post 1699638863 03-24-2024, 07:26 AM
-
#26
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Already stated this, and not saying you presumed otherwise, but just re-stating for clarity: I have no issue with these recommendations.

What bothered me was the organized propaganda against Ivermectin. Not that it had not been shown to be effective, or that you should only use human-grade drugs, that only take it with prescriptions, etc... that is all fine, well and good.

It's this kind of thing, also from the FDA:

Or the attacks on Joe Rogan, who only took it as part of a litany of safe doctor-prescribed drugs (and infuriated CNN by recovering quickly), where they doctored photos of him looking sickly, ran stories propagandizing against him - and everyone else who contributed to a narrative that ivermectin was not safe, was for animals and where pharmacies wouldn't even fill doctor's prescriptions for it.

I don't know how apart someone like you, r0bo or JLC even are from this stance, I don't think all that much, beyond not thinking it's as important or as big a deal as I do. Which is fine. You don't have to, no more than I need to get up in arms about specific problems you might care more about. I don't think any of you are vegan or big animal right activists, but let's say someone is: I don't have to feel as passionately about their cause as they do and give up meat, but at the same time I can see footage of what goes on in slaughterhouses and find common ground that it's immoral.

It's okay to find common ground with people, it's the first step to any solution. Not that any of us are going to solve anything, but at the least it might help us understand things from each other's perspectives more. Versus going out of our way to ensure we find no common ground with someone we disagree with.
Joe Rogan was on a monoclonal infusion.
post 1699640963 03-24-2024, 08:53 AM
-
#27
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Among other vaccines, yes.
A baby should get the COVID jab? Even in 2024?
post 1699641313 03-24-2024, 09:06 AM
-
#28
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
A baby should get the COVID jab? Even in 2024?
Evidence suggests improved outcomes for pregnant women who receive covid vaccines. Evidence also suggests priming a child's naive immune system is beneficial.

That's the case for most routine vaccines.
post 1699641583 03-24-2024, 09:12 AM
-
#29
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  1. messomi
  2. ▇ █ █ ▇ █ █ ▇
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Posts: 20,365
  5. Rep Power: 362412
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Evidence suggests improved outcomes for pregnant women who receive covid vaccines. Evidence also suggests priming a child's naive immune system is beneficial.

That's the case for most routine vaccines.
negged
post 1699641903 03-24-2024, 09:23 AM
-
#30
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
Evidence suggests improved outcomes for pregnant women who receive covid vaccines. Evidence also suggests priming a child's naive immune system is beneficial.

That's the case for most routine vaccines.
And yet you aren't boosted? Care to explain why?
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts