Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Trump has now taken out Obama, (--->) Biden and Hillary -- who's next?
  1. Results 1 to 22 of 22
post 1703954561 07-21-2024, 12:20 PM
-
#1
  1. eddiehaskell
  1. eddiehaskell
  2. Join Date: Oct 2009
  3. Age: 42
  4. Posts: 16,178
  5. Rep Power: 33829

Trump has now taken out Obama, (--->) Biden and Hillary -- who's next?

Who wants some now? Bring it.
post 1703954701 07-21-2024, 12:23 PM
-
#2
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,042
  6. Rep Power: 14673
This is probably bad news for Trump.

Dems just need to run someone with no major skeletons and it will be a pretty close race.

Like it or not 60% of the country will never vote for Trump due to politics, crass + rude personality, old age, Jan 6, or just because that's what the TV tells them to do.

Of course that's assuming the Dems don't implode in the next month with massive power struggles as multiple factions struggle to get their guy as the candidate.
post 1703955001 07-21-2024, 12:27 PM
-
#3
  1. eddiehaskell
  1. eddiehaskell
  2. Join Date: Oct 2009
  3. Age: 42
  4. Posts: 16,178
  5. Rep Power: 33829
Originally Posted By JackyChin
This is probably bad news for Trump.

Dems just need to run someone with no major skeletons and it will be a pretty close race.
who day got with national name recognition that can win an election in 3 months?

imagine all the pissed off people that already placed bets on biden being the next potus.
post 1703955191 07-21-2024, 12:32 PM
-
#4
  1. jimbob007
  2. Keep The Red Flag Flying
  1. jimbob007
  2. Keep The Red Flag Flying
  3. Join Date: Mar 2007
  4. Location: From Anywhere He Darn Well Pleases, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 99,476
  6. Rep Power: 275015
How did he take out Obama exactly?
post 1703955201 07-21-2024, 12:32 PM
-
#5
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
Originally Posted By eddiehaskell
who day got with national name recognition that can win an election in 3 months?
Michelle Obama.
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1703955281 07-21-2024, 12:33 PM
-
#6
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,042
  6. Rep Power: 14673
Originally Posted By eddiehaskell
who day got with national name recognition that can win an election in 3 months?

imagine all the pissed off people that already placed bets on biden being the next potus.
They don't need name recognition. Not being DJT is their name recognition. Dems could run the most milquetoast politician like Tim Kaine, it wouldn't matter. In some ways it would probably be better for them that way.

All they have to do is be all the things Trump is not. Not populist, not rude and crass, not 78 years old, not associated with Jan 6, not in the paper with multiple lawsuits and convictions.

Dems and dem-leaning-independents aren't voting "for" anyone. They're voting "against" Trump.
post 1703955601 07-21-2024, 12:38 PM
-
#7
  1. AstroGym79
  2. Not easier, but better.
  1. AstroGym79
  2. Not easier, but better.
  3. Join Date: May 2023
  4. Posts: 872
  5. Rep Power: 5259
Originally Posted By JackyChin
They don't need name recognition. Not being DJT is their name recognition. Dems could run the most milquetoast politician like Tim Kaine, it wouldn't matter. In some ways it would probably be better for them that way.

All they have to do is be all the things Trump is not. Not populist, not rude and crass, not 78 years old, not associated with Jan 6, not in the paper with multiple lawsuits and convictions.

Dems and independents aren't voting "for" anyone. They're voting "against" Trump.
Hi there. Welcome to 2024 I see you're a libtard who's been asleep for the past 4 years.
Astro Gym, Covina CA: 1979-2005
The Last Real Gym.
post 1703955931 07-21-2024, 12:45 PM
-
#8
  1. eddiehaskell
  1. eddiehaskell
  2. Join Date: Oct 2009
  3. Age: 42
  4. Posts: 16,178
  5. Rep Power: 33829
Originally Posted By JackyChin
They don't need name recognition. Not being DJT is their name recognition. Dems could run the most milquetoast politician like Tim Kaine, it wouldn't matter. In some ways it would probably be better for them that way.

All they have to do is be all the things Trump is not. Not populist, not rude and crass, not 78 years old, not associated with Jan 6, not in the paper with multiple lawsuits and convictions.

Dems and dem-leaning-independents aren't voting "for" anyone. They're voting "against" Trump.
dems on here telling us how great biden is earlier today...now saying how great it will be to run someone else. you can't make this chit up
post 1703956141 07-21-2024, 12:50 PM
-
#9
  1. SYKO227
  2. making Bert decals
  1. SYKO227
  2. making Bert decals
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 13,679
  6. Rep Power: 43122
Originally Posted By JackyChin
This is probably bad news for Trump.

Dems just need to run someone with no major skeletons and it will be a pretty close race.

Like it or not 60% of the country will never vote for Trump due to politics, crass + rude personality, old age, Jan 6, or just because that's what the TV tells them to do.

Of course that's assuming the Dems don't implode in the next month with massive power struggles as multiple factions struggle to get their guy as the candidate.
No skeletons? They have mass graves in their closets.
*MFC*
*MAGA*



"I've always wanted to kick a duck up the arse" - Karl Pilkington

WWG1WGA
post 1703956151 07-21-2024, 12:50 PM
-
#10
  1. PissantSoldier
  2. ἀρχιεπίσ
  1. PissantSoldier
  2. ἀρχιεπίσ
  3. Join Date: Dec 2011
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 9,826
  7. Rep Power: 32032
Originally Posted By jimbob007
How did he take out Obama exactly?
It’s best not to ask a retard a question

Just say “oh wow, that’s amazing and so interesting!” and hope he stops talking
++Positive Crew++

Illuminati Crew

Audrey Hepburn Crew
post 1703956361 07-21-2024, 12:54 PM
-
#11
  1. eddiehaskell
  1. eddiehaskell
  2. Join Date: Oct 2009
  3. Age: 42
  4. Posts: 16,178
  5. Rep Power: 33829
Originally Posted By Muzziupress
George Bush, Jeb Bush, Mitch McConnell, Kevin McCarthy, Liz Cheney, etc
dude has laid waste to the political landscape in america while putting the media on their knees and even surviving an assassination attempt
post 1703956441 07-21-2024, 12:56 PM
-
#12
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,042
  6. Rep Power: 14673
Originally Posted By SYKO227
No skeletons? They have mass graves in their closets.
Some definitely do, other's don't. Dem politicians aren't a monolithic bloc, just like Republicans some are clean others are corrupt, some do it for selfless reasons, other are selfish.
Originally Posted By eddiehaskell
dems on here telling us how great biden is earlier today...now saying how great it will be to run someone else. you can't make this chit up
Weird of you to assume "dems" all have exactly the same thoughts. And I'm not even that liberal, I'd probably vote for Romney over Biden
post 1703956451 07-21-2024, 12:56 PM
-
#13
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Location: MISC Island
  5. Posts: 29,853
  6. Rep Power: 233414
biden already endorsed harris. not sure they'd have someone replace her. maybe a vp for someone like clinton or whitmer
🟩🟩🟩🟩 I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. 🟩🟩🟩🟩
post 1703956821 07-21-2024, 01:04 PM
-
#14
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  2. Join Date: Jul 2018
  3. Age: 56
  4. Posts: 35,146
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 120067
Originally Posted By JackyChin
They don't need name recognition. Not being DJT is their name recognition. Dems could run the most milquetoast politician like Tim Kaine, it wouldn't matter. In some ways it would probably be better for them that way.

All they have to do is be all the things Trump is not. Not populist, not rude and crass, not 78 years old, not associated with Jan 6, not in the paper with multiple lawsuits and convictions.

Dems and dem-leaning-independents aren't voting "for" anyone. They're voting "against" Trump.
Not sure why y'all are disagreeing witg this post.


Dem voters want anybody but Trump. They're scared of him and they hate his guts, so the Dem nominee literally doesn't matter. They'll vote for a skeleton over Trump
post 1703957261 07-21-2024, 01:13 PM
-
#15
  1. TryingMen
  2. Okie Dokie
  1. TryingMen
  2. Okie Dokie
  3. Join Date: Jan 2023
  4. Posts: 8,457
  5. Rep Power: 38982
Originally Posted By PissantSoldier
It’s best not to ask a retard a question

Just say “oh wow, that’s amazing and so interesting!” and hope he stops talking
oh wow, that’s amazing and so interesting!
post 1703957301 07-21-2024, 01:13 PM
-
#16
  1. eddiehaskell
  1. eddiehaskell
  2. Join Date: Oct 2009
  3. Age: 42
  4. Posts: 16,178
  5. Rep Power: 33829
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey
Not sure why y'all are disagreeing witg this post.


Dem voters want anybody but Trump. They're scared of him and they hate his guts, so the Dem nominee literally doesn't matter. They'll vote for a skeleton over Trump
dems were ready to vote biden up until an hour ago even though they had been told for 4 years he wasn't fit to serve...now they ready to vote for somebody they don't even know the name of. sheep personified
post 1703957401 07-21-2024, 01:15 PM
-
#17
  1. radrd
  1. radrd
  2. Join Date: Apr 2018
  3. Posts: 13,526
  4. Rep Power: 146798
I'm glad Trump kept Obama from getting that third term as president. I thought we were in real trouble there.
post 1703957491 07-21-2024, 01:16 PM
-
#18
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  2. Join Date: Jul 2018
  3. Age: 56
  4. Posts: 35,146
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 120067
Originally Posted By eddiehaskell
dems were ready to vote biden up until an hour ago even though they had been told for 4 years he wasn't fit to serve...now they ready to vote for somebody they don't even know the name of. sheep personified
Because I just told you they'll vote for a skeleton over Trump.

Maybe they didn't like Biden, they saw he was old. They saw his speeches. But in their eyes he was the better option over Trump. If Biden changed his mind tomorrow and was the nominee Dems would 100% vote for him.
post 1703957581 07-21-2024, 01:17 PM
-
#19
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 22,267
  6. Rep Power: 86921
Originally Posted By JackyChin
They don't need name recognition. Not being DJT is their name recognition. Dems could run the most milquetoast politician like Tim Kaine, it wouldn't matter. In some ways it would probably be better for them that way.

All they have to do is be all the things Trump is not. Not populist, not rude and crass, not 78 years old, not associated with Jan 6, not in the paper with multiple lawsuits and convictions.

Dems and dem-leaning-independents aren't voting "for" anyone. They're voting "against" Trump.
"populist" aka not popular? are you retarded?
post 1703957641 07-21-2024, 01:18 PM
-
#20
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 22,267
  6. Rep Power: 86921
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey
Not sure why y'all are disagreeing witg this post.


Dem voters want anybody but Trump. They're scared of him and they hate his guts, so the Dem nominee literally doesn't matter. They'll vote for a skeleton over Trump
it's not about dems or republicans, the game has always been to win over the moderate and undecided voters
post 1703957871 07-21-2024, 01:22 PM
-
#21
  1. niospecv
  2. I mean yeah...
  1. niospecv
  2. I mean yeah...
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Posts: 38,152
  5. Rep Power: 214442
Originally Posted By jackychin
this is probably bad news for trump.

Dems just need to run someone with no major skeletons and it will be a pretty close race.

Like it or not 60% of the country will never vote for trump due to politics, crass + rude personality, old age, jan 6, or just because that's what the tv tells them to do.

Of course that's assuming the dems don't implode in the next month with massive power struggles as multiple factions struggle to get their guy as the candidate.
cope
**Texas Crew**
**Ultra MAGA Crew**
**Pure Blood Crew**
**Dallas Cowboys Fan Crew**
post 1703957961 07-21-2024, 01:23 PM
-
#22
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  1. JackyChin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,042
  6. Rep Power: 14673
Originally Posted By outfoxxed
"populist" aka not popular? are you retarded?
Originally Posted By Wikipedia
Populism is a range of political stances that emphasize the idea of "the people" and often juxtapose this group with "the elite". It is frequently associated with anti-establishment and anti-political sentiment. The term developed in the late 19th century and has been applied to various politicians, parties and movements since that time, often as a pejorative.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populism

It is possible to be populist without being popular - for example, RFK Jr the 3rd party candidate could be considered populist but has no chance of winning the popular vote.

On the other hand George W. Bush would not be considered "populist" since he was very pro-establishment but won 2 terms in office and is still favorably regarded by many voters.

Hope this helps!
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts