Sign in

Forum » More General Categories » Misc. » Nvidia CEO: stop teaching kids how to code. AI will replace them.
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 62
  2. Page 1 of 3
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  7. Last

Thread: Nvidia CEO: stop teaching kids how to code. AI will replace them.

  1. Rate This Thread
02-27-2024, 11:48 AM
#1

Nvidia CEO: stop teaching kids how to code. AI will replace them.

Techcels on suicide watch

Jensen Huang says kids shouldn't learn to code — they should leave it up to AI
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-in...ve-it-up-to-ai
  1. TCmaxxing
  2. Registered User
  3. TCmaxxings avatar
  1. TCmaxxing
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 3,448
  6. Rep Power: 0
Quote
02-27-2024, 11:52 AM
#2
lmao imagine being an NVIDIA dev who actually understands AI's limitations and this guy is your CEO and thinks AI is skynet
  1. skunkshark
  2. Registered User
  3. skunksharks avatar
  1. skunkshark
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 331
  7. Rep Power: 4,382
Quote
02-27-2024, 11:53 AM
#3
Originally Posted By skunkshark⏩
lmao imagine being an NVIDIA dev who actually understands AI's limitations and this guy is your CEO and thinks AI is skynet
This comment is not gonna age well brah.
________________________________________________________________
"Proudkraut" is an imaginary online persona displaying exaggerated or extreme views and comments as a form of artistic satire. Any comments made by the internet persona "Proudkraut" are not to be taken serious and shall not reflect on the integrity and morals of the actor portraying "Proudkraut".
By interacting with any content generated by "Proudkraut", you acknowledge having read and understood this disclaimer.
  1. ProudKraut
  2. Registered User
  3. ProudKrauts avatar
  1. ProudKraut
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Hessen, Germany
  5. Posts: 3,728
  6. Rep Power: 46,168
Quote
02-27-2024, 11:53 AM
#4
lmao tours over geeks
*Of the ugly or strange look Crew*
*🚷 Anti-Degeneracy League 🚷*
*To crush your enemies, to see them fall at your feet — to take their horses and goods and hear the lamentation of their women Crew*
*Pureblood Chad Crew*
*6'1 Master Race Crew*
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. DrugsToGetBigs avatar
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 31
  6. Posts: 19,171
  7. Rep Power: 363,762
Quote
02-27-2024, 11:53 AM
#5
That's amazing if it turns out to be the case.
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  3. ParsleyTeas avatar
  1. ParsleyTea
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2009
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 9,027
  6. Rep Power: 50,203
Quote
02-27-2024, 11:59 AM
#6
Learn to mine coal.
**Florida Crew**
**Waiting for National Guard Bus Ride to Labor Camp Crew**
  1. naich
  2. Bar Bender
  3. naichs avatar
  1. naich
  2. Bar Bender
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 13,022
  5. Rep Power: 105,622
Quote
02-27-2024, 11:59 AM
#7
He's not wrong. ChatGPT is already better at coding than probably 99% of people who went to school for it. And it'll only get better.
  1. Unstumpable
  2. Registered User
  3. Unstumpables avatar
  1. Unstumpable
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 14,946
  6. Rep Power: 220,701
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:00 PM
#8
What a retarded statement.

If AI can code as good as humans, then AI can make better chips than humans and AI will replace NVIDA.
  1. ymer
  2. Red
  3. ymers avatar
  1. ymer
  2. Red
  3. Join Date: Feb 2005
  4. Posts: 17,886
  5. Rep Power: 101,429
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:01 PM
#9
hes right, future coding is not going to exist..

tech job industry is gon die, its time to be a tradie
*** Free Thinker Crew ***

*** Herbert The Future GOAT Crew ***

*** HTC ***
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. rocketfishs avatar
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 18,523
  7. Rep Power: 57,311
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:01 PM
#10
If the AI was smart enough to code without humans, then what job would you teach kids? At that point, everything could be converted to machine learning.
  1. Contribution05
  2. Registered User
  3. Contribution05s avatar
  1. Contribution05
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: Illinois, United States
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 4,677
  7. Rep Power: 31,626
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:02 PM
#11
Originally Posted By Contribution05⏩
If the AI was smart enough to code without humans, then what job would you teach kids? At that point, everything could be converted to machine learning.
the only thing left, trade school, too far away from robots repairs people's plumbing and electrical work
*** Free Thinker Crew ***

*** Herbert The Future GOAT Crew ***

*** HTC ***
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. rocketfishs avatar
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 18,523
  7. Rep Power: 57,311
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:04 PM
#12
He argues the rise of AI means we can replace programming languages with human language prompts thus enabling everyone to be a programmer.

AI will kill coding.
This was in the article but is not a quote from the CEO.

The useful part of a programmer is being able to solve a problem logically/mathematically. If you ask a random person to solve some math/code problem in English they won't all give you the right answer. Being able to "code" in English doesn't matter at all.

It's not surprising that the CEO thinks that "coders" are just people who know how to type in "those goofy programming languages" because hiring in the field has been focused on what "languages" you know and which "certs" you have for a long time.
  1. skunkshark
  2. Registered User
  3. skunksharks avatar
  1. skunkshark
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 331
  7. Rep Power: 4,382
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:06 PM
#13
learn how to interface with ai

that is the real money
  1. mikebadg3
  2. Registered User
  3. mikebadg3s avatar
  1. mikebadg3
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Posts: 13,256
  5. Rep Power: 128,800
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:11 PM
#14
Originally Posted By Unstumpable⏩
He's not wrong. ChatGPT is already better at coding than probably 99% of people who went to school for it. And it'll only get better.
Lmao, wrong. ChatGPT is fuking awful at coding anything other than a rudimentary self contained function if its not hand held the entire time

Source: been programming for 15+ years
  1. Vrykul
  2. Registered User
  3. Vrykuls avatar
  1. Vrykul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2015
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,300
  6. Rep Power: 35,650
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:12 PM
#15
The reality is that any efficiency improvements often result in less jobs.

In the early days of humanity, lots of people were farmers. Probably like 50% of the population. But we got better farm equipment like plows, fertilizer, mules, black people, tractors, mexicans, harvesting machines, fertilizer etc. Now only a fraction of people are actually farmers and urban flight is real

The question is if we can redirect those efficiency improvements into more productivity (i.e. collectively double the amount of programming work done in the world) or less jobs (same amount of programming work but done by less people)
Sniff hard as fuk when guys pass by to smell their balls crew
Don't know how to hold arms when walking crew
Has to use a soundboard to order pizza crew
Order pizza and lower money from second floor in bucket crew
Bodybuilders against lifting crew
Mod Negs: 3
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  3. outfoxxeds avatar
  1. outfoxxed
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2010
  4. Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 17,132
  6. Rep Power: 86,921
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:15 PM
#16
Nah, this is just another tech industry downturn that has happened over and over again. The highs are insanely glorious but the cyclical downturns are brutal.
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. 6gorillions avatar
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2023
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 3,200
  6. Rep Power: 64,857
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:17 PM
#17
Originally Posted By Unstumpable⏩
He's not wrong. ChatGPT is already better at coding than probably 99% of people who went to school for it. And it'll only get better.
whilst this is partially true. it cannot fix all issues i have come across in php files on WP.

i've asked it to fix certain code and it's 50/50.

that doesn't mean it doesn't work when writing code from scratch. i am talking editing existing code. it's not always good at detecting what is specifically needed to get sh*t working
  1. AWillis
  2. Social media influencer
  3. AWilliss avatar
  1. AWillis
  2. Social media influencer
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 26,037
  5. Rep Power: 166,135
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:33 PM
#18
Been tellin ya'll, AI is going to replace about 90% of white collar labor. Officecels on suicide watch.
  1. JayJ350
  2. Registered User
  3. JayJ350s avatar
  1. JayJ350
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 36
  6. Posts: 44,531
  7. Rep Power: 275,669
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:33 PM
#19
Yep - what a world, who would have guessed tradies are on the verge of becoming the new ruling class of income.
#FreeCryptoBandit
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  3. wickedmans avatar
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 27,798
  6. Rep Power: 79,002
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:39 PM
#20


He's not wrong.

But who does he think develops AIs?
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. LogicalLiftss avatar
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 6,987
  6. Rep Power: 203,642
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:40 PM
#21
Originally Posted By wickedman⏩
Yep - what a world, who would have guessed tradies are on the verge of becoming the new ruling class of income.


see Krackerjacked's sig
  1. BrianDaMan
  2. Registered User
  3. BrianDaMans avatar
  1. BrianDaMan
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Posts: 13,587
  5. Rep Power: 383,195
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:40 PM
#22
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩


He's not wrong.

But who does he think develops AIs?
AI will develop better AI
*** Free Thinker Crew ***

*** Herbert The Future GOAT Crew ***

*** HTC ***
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. rocketfishs avatar
  1. rocketfish
  2. San Diego
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: Nevada, United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 18,523
  7. Rep Power: 57,311
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:41 PM
#23
I am an ML engineer and most of ML is if else statements, haven't worked on AI yet but it has its limitations
Every Man apart, Every Man an Emperor
  1. Brommando
  2. Registered User
  3. Brommandos avatar
  1. Brommando
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Age: 26
  5. Posts: 1,795
  6. Rep Power: 10,639
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:42 PM
#24
…maybe in like 20-30 years, but for now we need actual people who can code.
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  3. ispys avatar
  1. ispy
  2. ✅ Verified Miscer
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 25,799
  6. Rep Power: 222,394
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:43 PM
#25
Originally Posted By Vrykul⏩
Lmao, wrong. ChatGPT is fuking awful at coding anything other than a rudimentary self contained function if its not hand held the entire time

Source: been programming for 15+ years
#facts

it doesn't do a very good job, not to mention most applications will have functional rules related to its business and ChatGPT will never figure that aspect out
  1. sabusake
  2. Registered User
  3. sabusakes avatar
  1. sabusake
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Age: 52
  5. Posts: 574
  6. Rep Power: 3,426
Quote
02-27-2024, 12:48 PM
#26
AWSbrah on ropewatch or nah ?
  1. OffwhiteBrah
  2. Milf Hunter
  3. OffwhiteBrahs avatar
  1. OffwhiteBrah
  2. Milf Hunter
  3. Join Date: Apr 2015
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 31,035
  6. Rep Power: 509,209
Quote
02-27-2024, 01:05 PM
#27
Originally Posted By outfoxxed⏩
The reality is that any efficiency improvements often result in less jobs.

In the early days of humanity, lots of people were farmers. Probably like 50% of the population. But we got better farm equipment like plows, fertilizer, mules, black people , tractors, mexicans , harvesting machines, fertilizer etc. Now only a fraction of people are actually farmers and urban flight is real

The question is if we can redirect those efficiency improvements into more productivity (i.e. collectively double the amount of programming work done in the world) or less jobs (same amount of programming work but done by less people)
*Updated* If you can't hit a 320 yard drive, are you even a man?
  1. Holyfenix
  2. Registered User
  3. Holyfenixs avatar
  1. Holyfenix
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 6,304
  7. Rep Power: 55,891
Quote
02-27-2024, 01:18 PM
#28
Originally Posted By Brommando⏩
I am an ML engineer and most of ML is if else statements, haven't worked on AI yet but it has its limitations
Lol.

Not true at all
  1. skier!
  2. Rhodium Membership
  3. skier!s avatar
  1. skier!
  2. Rhodium Membership
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 3,114
  6. Rep Power: 55,381
Quote
02-27-2024, 01:21 PM
#29
so if 3/4 people are unemployed in the future cause their job is "AI"-ed out now, then wtf would happen?

Lol the mass riots would be epic.
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. 6gorillions avatar
  1. 6gorillion
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2023
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 3,200
  6. Rep Power: 64,857
Quote
02-27-2024, 02:47 PM
#30
Originally Posted By skier!⏩
Lol.

Not true at all
It's true, you adjust the parameter just like an if else statements for the most part
Every Man apart, Every Man an Emperor
  1. Brommando
  2. Registered User
  3. Brommandos avatar
  1. Brommando
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2016
  4. Age: 26
  5. Posts: 1,795
  6. Rep Power: 10,639
Quote
Bookmarks
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Google
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts