Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Misc.
» 90% of people who do okay in life had okay parents and grew up okay.
- Results 1 to 3 of 3
08-19-2024, 10:51 AM
#1
90% of people who do okay in life had okay parents and grew up okay.
Thoughts?
34 - Former Cop
-Tampa Bay Buccaneers-
Post Your Fantasy Football Squads Here -
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=185811031&p=1705770171#post1705770171
08-19-2024, 11:14 AM
#2
That's the belief of many. Children raised by two parents, a man and women, have been found to do better in life typically.
Unfortunately politically on the left there is less desire to see families. Single females are a reliable voting block for Democrats.
The Black Family Is Struggling, and It’s Not Because of Slavery
https://www.dailysignal.com/2017/09/...g-not-slavery/
That the problems of today’s black Americans are a result of a legacy of slavery, racial discrimination, and poverty has achieved an axiomatic status, thought to be self-evident and beyond question.
This is what academics and the civil rights establishment have taught. But as with so much of what’s claimed by leftists, there is little evidence to support it.
The No. 1 problem among blacks is the effects stemming from a very weak family structure.
The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now
Children from fatherless homes are likelier to drop out of high school, die by suicide, have behavioral disorders, join gangs, commit crimes, and end up in prison. They are also likelier to live in poverty-stricken households.
But is the weak black family a legacy of slavery?
In 1960, just 22 percent of black children were raised in single-parent families. Fifty years later, more than 70 percent of black children were raised in single-parent families.
Here’s my question: Was the increase in single-parent black families after 1960 a legacy of slavery, or might it be a legacy of the welfare state ushered in by the War on Poverty?
According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, that year 11 percent of black children were born to unwed mothers. Today about 75 percent of black children are born to unwed mothers.
Is that supposed to be a delayed response to the legacy of slavery?
The bottom line is that the black family was stronger the first 100 years after slavery than during what will be the second 100 years.
At one time, almost all black families were poor, regardless of whether one or both parents were present. Today roughly 30 percent of blacks are poor.
However, two-parent black families are rarely poor. Only 8 percent of black married-couple families live in poverty. Among black families in which both the husband and wife work full time, the poverty rate is under 5 percent. Poverty in black families headed by single women is 37 percent.
The undeniable truth is that neither slavery nor Jim Crow nor the harshest racism has decimated the black family the way the welfare state has.
The black family structure is not the only retrogression suffered by blacks in the age of racial enlightenment.
In every census from 1890 to 1954, blacks were either just as active or more so than whites in the labor market. During that earlier period, black teen unemployment was roughly equal to or less than white teen unemployment.
As early as 1900, the duration of black unemployment was 15 percent shorter than that of whites. Today it’s about 30 percent longer.
Would anyone suggest that during earlier periods, there was less racial discrimination?….
Unfortunately politically on the left there is less desire to see families. Single females are a reliable voting block for Democrats.
The Black Family Is Struggling, and It’s Not Because of Slavery
https://www.dailysignal.com/2017/09/...g-not-slavery/
That the problems of today’s black Americans are a result of a legacy of slavery, racial discrimination, and poverty has achieved an axiomatic status, thought to be self-evident and beyond question.
This is what academics and the civil rights establishment have taught. But as with so much of what’s claimed by leftists, there is little evidence to support it.
The No. 1 problem among blacks is the effects stemming from a very weak family structure.
The Daily Signal depends on the support of readers like you. Donate now
Children from fatherless homes are likelier to drop out of high school, die by suicide, have behavioral disorders, join gangs, commit crimes, and end up in prison. They are also likelier to live in poverty-stricken households.
But is the weak black family a legacy of slavery?
In 1960, just 22 percent of black children were raised in single-parent families. Fifty years later, more than 70 percent of black children were raised in single-parent families.
Here’s my question: Was the increase in single-parent black families after 1960 a legacy of slavery, or might it be a legacy of the welfare state ushered in by the War on Poverty?
According to the 1938 Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, that year 11 percent of black children were born to unwed mothers. Today about 75 percent of black children are born to unwed mothers.
Is that supposed to be a delayed response to the legacy of slavery?
The bottom line is that the black family was stronger the first 100 years after slavery than during what will be the second 100 years.
At one time, almost all black families were poor, regardless of whether one or both parents were present. Today roughly 30 percent of blacks are poor.
However, two-parent black families are rarely poor. Only 8 percent of black married-couple families live in poverty. Among black families in which both the husband and wife work full time, the poverty rate is under 5 percent. Poverty in black families headed by single women is 37 percent.
The undeniable truth is that neither slavery nor Jim Crow nor the harshest racism has decimated the black family the way the welfare state has.
The black family structure is not the only retrogression suffered by blacks in the age of racial enlightenment.
In every census from 1890 to 1954, blacks were either just as active or more so than whites in the labor market. During that earlier period, black teen unemployment was roughly equal to or less than white teen unemployment.
As early as 1900, the duration of black unemployment was 15 percent shorter than that of whites. Today it’s about 30 percent longer.
Would anyone suggest that during earlier periods, there was less racial discrimination?….
- ParsleyTea
- Registered User
- ParsleyTea
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2009
- Age: 54
- Posts: 9,027
- Rep Power: 50,203
-
08-19-2024, 11:29 AM
#3
Do you think the jews played a part in this?
34 - Former Cop
-Tampa Bay Buccaneers-
Post Your Fantasy Football Squads Here -
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=185811031&p=1705770171#post1705770171
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts