Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Your daily reminder Not to get married
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 132
  2. Page 2 of 5
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: Your daily reminder Not to get married

post 1542073711 01-28-2018, 07:58 AM
-
#31
  1. Rabbitjb
  2. LOL no
  1. Rabbitjb
  2. LOL no
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 18,501
  5. Rep Power: 390948
Originally Posted By DoYouEvenNEM⏩
What's up with all the women divorcing after hitting the wall? Physical peak is under 20 but these divorcees are always in their mid-40s and older..

Are they really expecting to get Chad with their husband's money or something?
I think they look around and wonder whether they should spend the rest of their lives as unhappily as they have the last however long it is, or whether enough is enough. It’s a last gasp attempt at living happily even if that should be alone

people are happier without someone who just makes them miserable. And tbh if I believed all the idiots that holler or randoms I met I’d believe I had options if that was my future too... even short term ones
post 1542074131 01-28-2018, 08:03 AM
-
#32
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  1. EoR
  2. 2021 Mr.Internet
  3. Join Date: Feb 2005
  4. Posts: 35,083
  5. Rep Power: 160146
Divorce law is an absolute travesty with outdated laws that no longer belong. I am sure feminist will protest about their preferential treatment though.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
post 1542074241 01-28-2018, 08:05 AM
-
#33
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  1. WillBrink
  2. INDUSTRY INSIDER
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 14,844
  6. Rep Power: 92463
Originally Posted By SerbianSickKant⏩
or write a prenup like any srs succesful man if you want to start a family
And make sure to live in a state that gives a chit about that pre nup. Not all do and many convince some judge it would not apply for X reasons and such. I know a dude that happened to and he got taken good.
BrinkZone, Where Bro-Science Got Rabies and Died!

www.BrinkZone.com

Check out my BrinkZone mini site on BB.com at:

www.bodybuilding.com/fun/willbrink.htm

=> President and Founder of Shaved head with goatee Crew
=> Science over bro science Crew
post 1542074371 01-28-2018, 08:08 AM
-
#34
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By SerbianSickKant⏩
or write a prenup like any srs succesful man if you want to start a family
Prenups aren't Magic Bulletes. At best, they only account for money and material things accrued before you got married. For example, in your bachelor years, if you had a 92' Honda Accord, a PS3 and some trashy stained furniture before you were married, but got a good job and got married and Bought an Audi S5 a PS4, brand new furniture and a couple of rave runners, she could potentially get half if not all of the new more expensive things you bought when you got married to her.

This would have been a bad deal for him regardless.
post 1542074941 01-28-2018, 08:14 AM
-
#35
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By MrBourbon⏩
My wife works and makes within $5k of what I do. Don't marry trash.
This is the only real solution. Thats why I laugh at miscers that make fun of guys like Zuckerberg and his homely wife. While she doesn't make more than him, she's been with him since the beginning and loved him even when he was poor, yet miscers here think he should be running around banging and marrying supermodels or some chit. Thats what the vast majority of rich people do (athletes/lottery winners) and it typically ends very badly.
post 1542075021 01-28-2018, 08:16 AM
-
#36
  1. salamisalem
  2. Sweet Prince of Paupers
  1. salamisalem
  2. Sweet Prince of Paupers
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 5,654
  6. Rep Power: 35909
Originally Posted By milesgiles1⏩
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz...s-divorce.html

Cliffs

Married to heffalump for 11 years no kids

Has to give her half of current assets (all earned by him)

AND may have to give her 1/3 of FUTURE earnings..

I'm just the messenger..
Thank you oh prophet of truth. Marriage is a farce. Such stupidity
We're all gonna make it crew

just decide on what you ACTUALLY want and then make it happen. thats it. ignore the rest and put in the work and one day you'll find your happy - vampirelol

You win or you learn

B: 275 D: 415 S: 315 = 1005 (11/2015)
post 1542075051 01-28-2018, 08:16 AM
-
#37
  1. milesgiles1
  2. Banned
  1. milesgiles1
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Posts: 1,243
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MichelleLnne⏩
She does work.. read the article again. OP is the one that said she doesn't work.
I didn't say she didn't work, I said all the marital assets were earned by him. She's a makeup artist ffs, what do you think she contributed to their net worth?
post 1542075141 01-28-2018, 08:19 AM
-
#38
  1. milesgiles1
  2. Banned
  1. milesgiles1
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Posts: 1,243
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jackleballs⏩
1/3 of future earnings? That's outrageous.

I don't know how the hell these judges get away with these awards. It's abuse, and it probably leads to murder in extreme cases.

Tell one of these gold digging twats to get a f'n job.
This hasn't been awarded yet (to be clear) but the story comes from HER lawyers, clearly because she thinks taking half their assets isn't enough.
post 1542075341 01-28-2018, 08:22 AM
-
#39
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: Prince From, Lagos, Nigeria
  5. Posts: 28,971
  6. Rep Power: 379644
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
I think they look around and wonder whether they should spend the rest of their lives as unhappily as they have the last however long it is, or whether enough is enough. It’s a last gasp attempt at living happily even if that should be alone

people are happier without someone who just makes them miserable. And tbh if I believed all the idiots that holler or randoms I met I’d believe I had options if that was my future too... even short term ones
I knew you'd post here

Lol at pre nups btw
****Bringing sixy back in 2019****
6'6" 666lbs......str8 sixy!

Who Tests God and Does Not Wager Their Lives?
post 1542075471 01-28-2018, 08:23 AM
-
#40
  1. Rabbitjb
  2. LOL no
  1. Rabbitjb
  2. LOL no
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 18,501
  5. Rep Power: 390948
Originally Posted By TommyRO⏩
I knew you'd post here

Lol at pre nups btw
I knew you’d post after me and quote me without adding anything to the thread

There’s a load of happily married people who post on this site ...conversations are boring when everyone has the same opinion or perspective
post 1542075681 01-28-2018, 08:27 AM
-
#41
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: Prince From, Lagos, Nigeria
  5. Posts: 28,971
  6. Rep Power: 379644
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
I knew you’d post after me and quote me without adding anything to the thread

There’s a load of happily married people who post on this site ...conversations are boring when everyone has the same opinion or perspective
I posted first! So what's your opinion on the future earnings that she's going after? All you said was general fluff
****Bringing sixy back in 2019****
6'6" 666lbs......str8 sixy!

Who Tests God and Does Not Wager Their Lives?
post 1542075711 01-28-2018, 08:28 AM
-
#42
  1. thorpowers
  2. Registered User
  1. thorpowers
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 3,431
  6. Rep Power: 9595
Western society is all about catering to women. This is why men are 80% of net tax payers, and women are 80% tax beneficiaries. Most welfare goes to single mothers. Only 1 in 3 women will be diagnosed with cancer by age 85, vs 1 in 2 for men; yet breast cancer receives more funding than testicular and prostate cancer combined by a significant amount. Women initiated the majority of divorces, and receive all the benefits so that she can enjoy a life that she's "become accustomed to" Nobody gives AF if the man has to move into his parents basement or live in a van after divorce, as long as he can keep providing money to his ex wife sloot....because vagina. The entire society revolves around taking care of women at the expense of men.

After knowing all this, and it's so plain to see, I don't pity the cucks who still willingly choose to sign their rights over to a woman in a one sided contract, who is inevitably going to end up divorce raping him in the end.
post 1542075791 01-28-2018, 08:29 AM
-
#43
  1. macrocrunch
  2. Ivanto Beleav
  1. macrocrunch
  2. Ivanto Beleav
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 5,043
  6. Rep Power: 25164
Originally Posted By milesgiles1⏩
You think he, or any other man, thought 'I know I'll marry a useless fukking dumb ratchet bitch' ?

Think before you post, you might at least give off the temporary illusion of being somewhat intelligent
Before you get married, you should know these things.
Laconic
post 1542076261 01-28-2018, 08:38 AM
-
#44
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 16,596
  6. Rep Power: 141961
Originally Posted By MichelleLnne⏩
Idk I'm getting a divorce soon and the divorce is all that matters to me.. I don't want anything else
Okay so you actually personally agree with me? You don't want anything out of your own divorce, yet you think this lady deserves something? Mind blowing stuff really.
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***

Rustle me = get repped
post 1542076461 01-28-2018, 08:40 AM
-
#45
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
I think they look around and wonder whether they should spend the rest of their lives as unhappily as they have the last however long it is, or whether enough is enough. It’s a last gasp attempt at living happily even if that should be alone

people are happier without someone who just makes them miserable. And tbh if I believed all the idiots that holler or randoms I met I’d believe I had options if that was my future too... even short term ones
Do you think its fair (as in this scenario) that guys more often that not get taken to the cleaners when they get divorced while women typically "gain" from it?
post 1542076591 01-28-2018, 08:44 AM
-
#46
  1. Legz422
  1. Legz422
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 57
  5. Posts: 45,715
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 626231
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
They had no kids, so it's not like she was sitting at home raising children. Why should she get ANYTHING at all?

It's one thing if there is a mutual decision for the woman to be a stay-at-home mother of a couple of kids. Of course then she can't advance her career and it's not exactly fair for her to get nothing after 20 years of sacrificing her career.

But that's not the case here. She's just a lazy biyatch who went after his money. Please explain to me why this lady should be given anything at all?
I agree. If no kids, she should only get half of the marital assets. Even with cheating involved and how chitty that is, I would walk away with my head held high not being a vengeful bish. Then hope Karma gets him and he rots in hell. lol
Originally Posted By Rabbitjb⏩
I think they look around and wonder whether they should spend the rest of their lives as unhappily as they have the last however long it is, or whether enough is enough. It’s a last gasp attempt at living happily even if that should be alone

people are happier without someone who just makes them miserable.
Exactly this. Being lonely when alone is much better than being lonely with someone that makes you miserable.
Originally Posted By MichelleLnne⏩
Idk I'm getting a divorce soon and the divorce is all that matters to me.. I don't want anything else
You are still married but have a boyfriend?

~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
post 1542076681 01-28-2018, 08:45 AM
-
#47
  1. meenman83
  2. Registered User
  1. meenman83
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2007
  4. Posts: 7,638
  5. Rep Power: 54289
To think she is using his money for her lawyer team too.
★cVc★ Waterboarding - Baptizing terrorists with Freedom since 02'
post 1542076831 01-28-2018, 08:47 AM
-
#48
  1. MichelleLnne
  2. Troll Patrol
  1. MichelleLnne
  2. Troll Patrol
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: Nunya, Bizness USA
  5. Age: 41
  6. Posts: 20,902
  7. Subscribers: 3
  8. Rep Power: 312836
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
Okay so you actually personally agree with me? You don't want anything out of your own divorce, yet you think this lady deserves something? Mind blowing stuff really.
I said in all my posts that what she's asking for is excessive, not right..
But I'm more in the middle on this based solely on the length of time they were together.. 22 years- you can't say that love wasn't involved and that kind of creates a gray area in my thinking. Honestly if a marriage ends both parties should want the best for the other..

Edit- I don't personally think I'm entitled to anything that I didn't work for.. however that doesn't mean that I can't see things from different angles
Ignore list:

Johnvee73
post 1542077431 01-28-2018, 08:56 AM
-
#49
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 16,596
  6. Rep Power: 141961
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
I agree. If no kids, she should only get half of the marital assets. Even with cheating involved and how chitty that is, I would walk away with my head held high not being a vengeful bish. Then hope Karma gets him and he rots in hell. lol
Granny legz spitting the truth. Seriously though it depends. I guess I could see even cases without kids where the woman should get something. Example: if somehow a woman stayed home and did some part time job from home and cooked/cleaned while the husband was spending 60 hrs a week at the office to make their lives better, then yea maybe she contributed a bit. If they were married for 25 years and got divorced, it's not unreasonable to say maybe she should get part of the assets. There are ways of contributing to assets in a marriage beyond just making money. But that is just not the case with most of these outrageous divorce cases.
Originally Posted By MichelleLnne⏩
I said in all my posts that what she's asking for is excessive, not right..
But I'm more in the middle on this based solely on the length of time they were together.. 22 years- you can't say that love wasn't involved and that kind of creates a gray area in my thinking. Honestly if a marriage ends both parties should want the best for the other..

Edit- I don't personally think I'm entitled to anything that I didn't work for.. however that doesn't mean that I can't see things from different angles
I'm still not following your angle. Of course love was involved... so what? Are you saying she should get paid for emotional damages?

Just to be clear, I'm not even trying to be a dik to you or anything, just genuinely curious as to why you're defending this terrible woman in any capacity. To be blunt, I think it may be just this instinct women have to defend other women no matter what. I hate to even say this cause I'm not sexist and I don't like thinking about things in this way, but it's just an honest observation.
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***

Rustle me = get repped
post 1542077631 01-28-2018, 08:59 AM
-
#50
  1. SpeedMan1
  2. Registered User
  1. SpeedMan1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Posts: 13,619
  6. Rep Power: 31758
Late 20’s brah and parents coming at me hard about that marriage stuff lately. Feels bad
post 1542078021 01-28-2018, 09:05 AM
-
#51
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 34,808
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 305138
Originally Posted By SerbianSickKant⏩
or write a prenup like any srs succesful man if you want to start a family
Why even get married if you're already planning for a divorce?
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1542078181 01-28-2018, 09:07 AM
-
#52
  1. Legz422
  1. Legz422
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 57
  5. Posts: 45,715
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 626231
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
Granny legz spitting the truth. Seriously though it depends. I guess I could see even cases without kids where the woman should get something. Example: if somehow a woman stayed home and did some part time job from home and cooked/cleaned while the husband was spending 60 hrs a week at the office to make their lives better, then yea maybe she contributed a bit. If they were married for 25 years and got divorced, it's not unreasonable to say maybe she should get part of the assets. There are ways of contributing to assets in a marriage beyond just making money. But that is just not the case with most of these outrageous divorce cases.
Yes, I agree that if they made the decision for her to be a homemaker that is a different story. There are couples like that with no kids, where the wife still stays home and takes care of all household responsibilities. That is entirely different, as it's harder to enter the workforce after a long lapse in employment. With that situation, I think it's fair for her to get support until she gets on her feet.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
post 1542078391 01-28-2018, 09:09 AM
-
#53
  1. IfeHearted
  2. Registered User
  1. IfeHearted
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 1,158
  6. Rep Power: 3356
I don't care a **** about the celebrity situation, but strictly speaking about the court and the precedent this sets, there is no way in hell a married couple getting a divorce with no kids, should have to pay their future earnings to the other. It's a ****ing divorce, it's over. Done. I'll be damned if this is actually true and somehow ends up being the result. Just no way.
post 1542078711 01-28-2018, 09:12 AM
-
#54
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: Prince From, Lagos, Nigeria
  5. Posts: 28,971
  6. Rep Power: 379644
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
Yes, I agree that if they made the decision for her to be a homemaker that is a different story. There are couples like that with no kids, where the wife still stays home and takes care of all household responsibilities. That is entirely different, as it's harder to enter the workforce after a long lapse in employment. With that situation, I think it's fair for her to get support until she gets on her feet.
Let's be real here both could be working 60 hours a week and no kids and she'd get half.
****Bringing sixy back in 2019****
6'6" 666lbs......str8 sixy!

Who Tests God and Does Not Wager Their Lives?
post 1542079031 01-28-2018, 09:16 AM
-
#55
  1. MajesticLion
  2. fidélité à la mort
  1. MajesticLion
  2. fidélité à la mort
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 18,671
  6. Rep Power: 67123
regularly

scheduled

programming
post 1542079181 01-28-2018, 09:18 AM
-
#56
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 16,596
  6. Rep Power: 141961
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
Yes, I agree that if they made the decision for her to be a homemaker that is a different story. There are couples like that with no kids, where the wife still stays home and takes care of all household responsibilities. That is entirely different, as it's harder to enter the workforce after a long lapse in employment. With that situation, I think it's fair for her to get support until she gets on her feet.
This may have been the case in very rare scenarios and it's honestly kind of a relic of a by-gone era. In 2018 if you have no kids and no job, then you're a deadbeat. Doesn't matter if it's a male or female. I could never date, let alone marry, a woman who would just "take care of the house" while I work. I lived alone for 8 years, can cook very well and my place was almost always spotless. Why would anyone need a stay at home wife with no kids in the past 20-30 years is beyond my understanding.

I'd say if there are no kids and the woman stayed home taking care of household duties, she may be entitled to idk 15-20% of assets and absolutely no support. It's not the man's duty to support her after their relationship ends. What she should get is what she has earned by doing what she did to contribute to the marriage. I don't think cooking and cleaning counts for much more than 15% and that's being sort of generous tbh. And how about all the left over time she had sitting at home watching bull**** TV and reading gossip magazines while the husband worked his ass off to support that lifestyle? Lol maybe she should be paying him back for some of those good times now that I think about it.
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***

Rustle me = get repped
post 1542079221 01-28-2018, 09:18 AM
-
#57
  1. Legz422
  1. Legz422
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 57
  5. Posts: 45,715
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 626231
Originally Posted By TommyRO⏩
Let's be real here both could be working 60 hours a week and no kids and she'd get half.
In some courts, yes, she could. However that's not what I was talking about. I was talking about what's fair and what's not in those situations. Your scenario I don't believe is fair at all, but I'm not the judge so it doesn't really matter what I think.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
post 1542079371 01-28-2018, 09:20 AM
-
#58
  1. milesgiles1
  2. Banned
  1. milesgiles1
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Posts: 1,243
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By SpeedMan1⏩
Late 20’s brah and parents coming at me hard about that marriage stuff lately. Feels bad
Just link them this article
post 1542079451 01-28-2018, 09:21 AM
-
#59
  1. Legz422
  1. Legz422
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 57
  5. Posts: 45,715
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 626231
Originally Posted By PisseninMisc⏩
This may have been the case in very rare scenarios and it's honestly kind of a relic of a by-gone era. In 2018 if you have no kids and no job, then you're a deadbeat. Doesn't matter if it's a male or female. I could never date, let alone marry, a woman who would just "take care of the house" while I work. I lived alone for 8 years, can cook very well and my place was almost always spotless. Why would anyone need a stay at home wife with no kids in the past 20-30 years is beyond my understanding.

I'd say if there are no kids and the woman stayed home taking care of household duties, she may be entitled to idk 15-20% of assets and absolutely no support. It's not the man's duty to support her after their relationship ends. What she should get is what she has earned by doing what she did to contribute to the marriage. I don't think cooking and cleaning counts for much more than 15% and that's being sort of generous tbh.
lol I was agreeing with your previous post and now you seem to be saying the opposite. Color me confused. lol

While I don't understand having a stay at home partner with no children, it does happen and it's an agreement made by both parties. So in that case, I do think it's fair for the one who stayed home to be able to get on their feet after the divorce. Re-entering the workforce after years away is not easy at all. Of course they should have to show proof of doing everything they can and not just be sitting around doing nothing saying they're trying.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
post 1542079791 01-28-2018, 09:27 AM
-
#60
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  1. PisseninMisc
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 16,596
  6. Rep Power: 141961
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
lol I was agreeing with your previous post and now you seem to be saying the opposite. Color me confused. lol

While I don't understand having a stay at home partner with no children, it does happen and it's an agreement made by both parties. So in that case, I do think it's fair for the one who stayed home to be able to get on their feet after the divorce. Re-entering the workforce after years away is not easy at all. Of course they should have to show proof of doing everything they can and not just be sitting around doing nothing saying they're trying.
Didn't mean to confuse you. What I was saying is they should get SOMETHING, not 1/2 the assets and a monthly payment too. Look women are adults just like men and have to live with their poor decisions just like men. If a woman decides to stay at home not doing chit without raising kids, then she should have to face the consequences of that decision.

Why should the man shoulder that responsibility? I get that it's hard to re-enter the workforce, so the solution is to work instead of sitting at home not doing jack chit. Women are not babies, they're adults responsible for their actions. They shouldn't put themselves in a situation where they could get screwed in a divorce.
*** Dawn Patrol Crew ***

Rustle me = get repped
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts