Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » lets see how smart miscers are
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 118
  2. Page 2 of 4
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: lets see how smart miscers are

post 1551595901 05-15-2018, 06:22 PM
-
#31
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By ChristianMR⏩
Das it.

But my actual best guess is 11. Each race of five allows you to drop 2 horses from the running (the final two horses in each race cannot possibly be the fastest 3). You drop 20 horses with the first 10 races. The last race of 5 determines the three winners.
This logic indeed would determine anupper boundfor the minimum. The minimum number of races can still be less than 11 though.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1551595921 05-15-2018, 06:22 PM
-
#32
  1. MajorTendonitis
  1. MajorTendonitis
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Location: East Kootenays BC
  5. Age: 65
  6. Height: 5'8"
  7. Weight: 241 lbs
  8. Posts: 42,047
  9. Subscribers: 8
  10. Rep Power: 718688
I’m going with 6 races
Back with my Fam
post 1551595951 05-15-2018, 06:22 PM
-
#33
  1. SuperMariBro
  2. Banned
  1. SuperMariBro
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2015
  4. Posts: 1,960
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By scooterbrah⏩
its not that simple. as others have pointed out, what if the 3 fastest ended up in the same Rd 1 heat?
How would you know that??? You have no stopwatch
post 1551596061 05-15-2018, 06:25 PM
-
#34
  1. LuNaTiC1988
  2. Registered User
  1. LuNaTiC1988
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 1,753
  6. Rep Power: 13909
Originally Posted By All-Star11⏩
you're not looking for the top 3...

if the fastest was in that heat, then he moves on. doesnt matter if the 2nd or 3rd over all was eliminates in round 1
The 3 fastest horses OUT OF 25. That IS top 3 in no particular order. its just a pita
Originally Posted By SuperMariBro⏩
How would you know that??? You have no stopwatch
You wouldn't.. the point is to find out.. and be right.
post 1551596391 05-15-2018, 06:30 PM
-
#35
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By SuperMariBro⏩
How would you know that??? You have no stopwatch
It's not about whether you know it or not, it's just a possible scenario. What if the top 3 overall just happened to all be in the first heat? Then the above process would not lead to them being selected as top 3 overall. Namely, the 2nd best overall could not end up in the top 3, as it wouldn't be in the final race.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1551596411 05-15-2018, 06:30 PM
-
#36
  1. Mortar34
  2. Unregistered
  1. Mortar34
  2. Unregistered
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 4,843
  6. Rep Power: 82485
Trick question.

If you don’t use a stopwatch you aren’t finding the “fastest,” you’re just discovering who won the most races. “Fastest” denotes time. Without time, it’s only a unilateral accomplishment.

If the answer was 6, 11, 12, etc..the stupid beasts could be crawling by the last race and you’d still crown a winner, but it wouldn't necessarily be the “fastest.”
"Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid."

"I don't know how I'm going to win, I just know I'm not going to lose."

MFC
post 1551596501 05-15-2018, 06:31 PM
-
#37
  1. metallicide
  2. Cuttin it up Brah
  1. metallicide
  2. Cuttin it up Brah
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 8,939
  6. Rep Power: 40619
Originally Posted By Mortar34⏩
Trick question.

If you don’t use a stopwatch you aren’t finding the “fastest,” you’re just discovering who won the most races. “Fastest” denotes time. Without time it’s only a unilateral accomplishment.

If the answer was 6, 11, 12, etc..the stupid beasts could be crawling by the last race and you’d still crown a winner, but it certainly wouldn’t be the “fastest.”
This, you'd have to have hundreds of races over long periods of time and see whos statistically the fastest.
**Infantry Combat Vet** OEF 08-09
*Cisco Networking Nerd*
**Patriots Crew**
**Tom Brady is a god**
post 1551596551 05-15-2018, 06:31 PM
-
#38
  1. Psychotropic
  2. Registered User
  1. Psychotropic
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 4,238
  6. Rep Power: 9667
Originally Posted By nothingshocking⏩
So, I would have 5 horses run.

I would take the winner, and have him race again with 4 other horses.

I would take the 1st and second and have them race against 3 other horses.

I would take the top 3 and race them against 2 other horses.

I would take the top 3 and race them against 2 other horses.

I would take the top 3 and race them against 2 other horses.

I would take the top 3 and race them against 2 other horses.

then all 20 horses have raced except the first 4 that lost, so they race again in case they were the 2 and 3...

I would take the top 3 and race them against 2 other horses.

I would take the top 3 and race them against 2 other horses.


so 9
you can't eliminate the 3rd horse from the 2nd race

and there are 25 horses not 20
post 1551596721 05-15-2018, 06:33 PM
-
#39
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By Mortar34⏩
Trick question.

If you don’t use a stopwatch you aren’t finding the “fastest,” you’re just discovering who won the most races. “Fastest” denotes time. Without time, it’s only a unilateral accomplishment.

If the answer was 6, 11, 12, etc..the stupid beasts could be crawling by the last race and you’d still crown a winner, but it wouldn't necessarily be the “fastest.”
A valid point, that's why most phrasings of this problem state the horses are actually mechanical objects- think wind up children's toys- that have a set velocity that doesn't change.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1551596821 05-15-2018, 06:34 PM
-
#40
  1. nothingshocking
  1. nothingshocking
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Location: Uranus, Gambia
  5. Posts: 36,399
  6. Subscribers: 5
  7. Rep Power: 951993
Originally Posted By Psychotropic⏩
you can't eliminate the 3rd horse from the 2nd race

and there are 25 horses not 20
yeah you're right
post 1551597031 05-15-2018, 06:36 PM
-
#41
  1. Mortar34
  2. Unregistered
  1. Mortar34
  2. Unregistered
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 4,843
  6. Rep Power: 82485
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
A valid point, that's why most phrasings of this problem state the horses are actually mechanical objects- think wind up children's toys- that have a set velocity that doesn't change.
Right. You have to eliminate the variables if not using time as the UoM.
"Life is hard. It's harder if you're stupid."

"I don't know how I'm going to win, I just know I'm not going to lose."

MFC
post 1551597241 05-15-2018, 06:38 PM
-
#42
  1. YIAMSOMEBODY
  2. Kobe The GOATBE
  1. YIAMSOMEBODY
  2. Kobe The GOATBE
  3. Join Date: Apr 2009
  4. Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  5. Posts: 64,733
  6. Rep Power: 179850
If they all run at a speed.of 200mph, why not keep them all????

Profit?
"ERMUHGAWD Crew"
"ERMUHGAW LOL...."
"Oh you, ERMUHGAWD!"
post 1551597361 05-15-2018, 06:39 PM
-
#43
  1. metallicide
  2. Cuttin it up Brah
  1. metallicide
  2. Cuttin it up Brah
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 8,939
  6. Rep Power: 40619
You could just go ahead and eliminate the white horses, clearly the black horses will be faster and more athletic, that narrows it down a bit.
**Infantry Combat Vet** OEF 08-09
*Cisco Networking Nerd*
**Patriots Crew**
**Tom Brady is a god**
post 1551597591 05-15-2018, 06:42 PM
-
#44
  1. BigTimeOperator
  1. BigTimeOperator
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Posts: 13,375
  5. Subscribers: 1
  6. Rep Power: 113717
I'm guessing you take the top 3 in each race, then eventually race them against each other.
post 1551597761 05-15-2018, 06:44 PM
-
#45
  1. DannStark
  2. Oblivious
  1. DannStark
  2. Oblivious
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: Winterfell, Canada
  5. Posts: 2,992
  6. Rep Power: 25990
Changing my answer to 7.
post 1551597921 05-15-2018, 06:46 PM
-
#46
  1. alphatan
  2. Registered User
  1. alphatan
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 4,599
  5. Rep Power: 0
I’m gonna get my degree by cheating so can’t really answer this skkr
Mod negged 100 times crew
Hate sjw liberals crew
55% of my posts are not serious


Lmao at hr reading my non pc posts
post 1551598531 05-15-2018, 06:54 PM
-
#47
  1. chino3
  1. chino3
  3. Join Date: Oct 2012
  4. Posts: 18,554
  5. Rep Power: 134275
So easy, it will be the horse that hits the ground last. the slow ones will hit the ground first, but the faster ones will hit the ground later because they are faster than gravity.
"It won't get better, just different."
post 1551598541 05-15-2018, 06:54 PM
-
#48
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
The minimum number of races required, X, has to be between 6 and 11.

-5 is not sufficient, because with 5 races we can race every horse exactly once, in the opening 5 heats. At most we are left with 5 winners, with no way to determine which of those 5 winners are the top 3. Thus X > 5.

- 11 racesissufficient, as was reasoned in the post above by ChristianMR. If you can do it in 11 races then 12 as a minimum number of races required wouldn't make sense. Thus X<12

So 6<=X<=11. I won't comment on the solution, because I'm familiar with the problem
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1551598911 05-15-2018, 07:00 PM
-
#49
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 1,039
  5. Rep Power: 2764
It's 6, you don't have a stopwatch but you obviously have photo finishes, and we're assuming that there's absolute consistency with the races right?

Race all horses, that's 5 races.
Race all the winners in one final race.
Then compare the distances between the horses on the photos.
post 1551599441 05-15-2018, 07:06 PM
-
#50
  1. DrunkenMoron
  2. Don't Rattle My Cage
  1. DrunkenMoron
  2. Don't Rattle My Cage
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 1,834
  5. Rep Power: 20276
Originally Posted By Beelze⏩
It's 6, you don't have a stopwatch but you obviously have photo finishes, and we're assuming that there's absolute consistency with the races right?

Race all horses, that's 5 races.
Race all the winners in one final race.
Then compare the distances between the horses on the photos.
That theory is incorrect. ( so me thinks )

What if say the first group of 5 horses had 2 of the fasted horses but you chose to eliminate 4 as '1' horse was the victor.. However the horse that placed second in that group was faster than the 20 remaining horses.. Just cause it lost to one horse in that group doesn't mean he's not second fastest..

Get it ? I think I get it.. made sense to me but coming out I started getting confused. So close to neggin op for making me think.. *******
- Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum -

** Egg Crew **
post 1551600331 05-15-2018, 07:19 PM
-
#51
  1. kingofturtles
  2. Registered User
  1. kingofturtles
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2012
  4. Posts: 8,206
  5. Rep Power: 56520
Came in to post 11. Looking for answer op
www.miscers.com

https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=177185321 ~ WoW Classic <MISCERS> guild horde thread GTFIH

320 bench press
1000lbs club at 190ish lbs

Chargers, Angels, Lakers, Canucks.
post 1551600421 05-15-2018, 07:20 PM
-
#52
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  1. stfudonny
  2. Registered Bowler
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 5,670
  5. Rep Power: 33213
the correct answer is:

Spoiler!
7
O|||||||O

white supremacist
post 1551600461 05-15-2018, 07:21 PM
-
#53
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 1,039
  5. Rep Power: 2764
Originally Posted By DrunkenMoron⏩
That theory doesn't is incorrect.

What if say the first group of 5 horses had 2 of the fasted horses but you chose to eliminate 4 as '1' horse was the victor.. However the horse that placed second in that group was faster than the 20 remaining horses.. Just cause it lost to one horse in that group doesn't mean he's not second fastest..

Get it ? I think I get it.. made sense to me but coming out I started getting confused. So close to neggin op for making me think.. *******
That's what the photo finishes are for, you just compare the distances between the horses. As I said for this question to work you require photo finishes and consistency. You check the photo in the 6th race, every horse is going to be then measurable by the distances between them, and you have the other photo finishes from the other races to check those against, it's simple really.
post 1551600621 05-15-2018, 07:22 PM
-
#54
  1. PeaceWithin
  2. Future non-fatty
  1. PeaceWithin
  2. Future non-fatty
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Posts: 9,889
  5. Rep Power: 146195
Seven races. Can't be bothered to type the whole thing out but...

You run five horses for five races (5 races)

You take the top five horses and run them for a final race (1 race)

There are still five more horses you need to race... 2nd/3rd place from the "finals" race... and the 2nd/3rd place from whichever heat the overall(absolute) winner won during the first set of five races, and most importantly... the 2nd place winner in whichever heat the 2nd place horse from the "finals" race ran in.

7 races.



EDIT: Lmao @ people talking about photo finishes and all kinds of other gimmicks. It's a logic puzzle... of course you could just use some kind of technology as a work around, but that would defeat the whole point of the thread.
MISC Blood Drive (MOD REPS): https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=175220881

Start: B-175/S-185/D-185/OHP-95
Current:B-335/S-365/D-365/OHP-215
Goals: B-365/S-405/D-495/OHP-225
post 1551601331 05-15-2018, 07:31 PM
-
#55
  1. ChristianMR
  2. domo arigato
  1. ChristianMR
  2. domo arigato
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 8,187
  5. Rep Power: 95385
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
This logic indeed would determine anupper boundfor the minimum. The minimum number of races can still be less than 11 though.
Yep, it was a quick guess. I knew that it could be done in 11, but I wasn't certain whether it can be done in fewer (I assume it probably can, particularly with you chiming in).

I'll take it one step further -- still setting the upper bound rather than guaranteeing the minimum.

-Eliminate 10 in the first round of 5 races, each with unique horses. (5 races)
-In the next race, race all of the third place horses from the prior races. It's only possible for one of these horses to be in the top 3 (in the scenario where the top 3 are all in the same heat). Eliminate 4 horses. (1 race).
-In the next race, race all of horses that finished second in the first round of races. Only one of these horses can be in the top 3 (either the top 3 are in the same heat, or 2 of the top 3 are in one heat, and the remaining one from another heat). Eliminate 4 horses. (1 race).
-You've now eliminated 18 horses and have 7 remaining.
-You can definitely finish this in 2 more races (by the eliminate 2 principle), but I think you might be able to finish in one race.

Thus, upper bound is 9, and lower bound is still 6.

Edit: Derp, answered above. Oh well. That was still fun.
Take it easy Christian
post 1551601451 05-15-2018, 07:33 PM
-
#56
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 1,039
  5. Rep Power: 2764
Originally Posted By PeaceWithin⏩
Seven races. Can't be bothered to type the whole thing out but...

You run five horses for five races (5 races)

You take the top five horses and run them for a final race (1 race)

There are still five more horses you need to race... 2nd/3rd place from the "finals" race... and the 2nd/3rd place from whichever heat the overall(absolute) winner won during the first set of five races, and most importantly... the 2nd place winner in whichever heat the 2nd place horse from the "finals" race ran in.

7 races.



EDIT: Lmao @ people talking about photo finishes and all kinds of other gimmicks. It's a logic puzzle... of course you could just use some kind of technology as a work around, but that would defeat the whole point of the thread.
Where in the OP does it say this is specifically an arithmetic puzzle? It says you don't have a stop watch that's all, now you're telling me that if you was in this situation it wouldn't occur to you that there's a different way that doesn't require as much hassle? Then you're fukkin dumb.
post 1551602191 05-15-2018, 07:41 PM
-
#57
  1. PeaceWithin
  2. Future non-fatty
  1. PeaceWithin
  2. Future non-fatty
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Posts: 9,889
  5. Rep Power: 146195
Originally Posted By Beelze⏩
Where in the OP does it say this is specifically an arithmetic puzzle? It says you don't have a stop watch that's all, now you're telling me that if you was in this situation it wouldn't occur to you that there's a different way that doesn't require as much hassle? Then you're fukkin dumb.
The OP doesn't say it's an arithmetic puzzle, but it gives you the assumption that you will be able to tell who the winner(s) of each heat was. The whole point of saying "no stopwatch" was just so you can't run 5 straight races and then compare times...

I'm still baffled how comparing photo finishes of different races would help you determine who is (absolutely) the fastest without also having a stopwatch to determine how fast the heat was. Just a finish of a horse at the finish line does nothing...

"As I saidfor this question to work you require photo finishes and consistency. You check the photo in the 6th race, every horse is going to be then measurable by the distances between them, and you have the other photo finishes from the other races to check those against, it's simple really."

So... every race needs to finish in the same amount of time? Seems like you're adding a lot of additional parameters to the OP.
MISC Blood Drive (MOD REPS): https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=175220881

Start: B-175/S-185/D-185/OHP-95
Current:B-335/S-365/D-365/OHP-215
Goals: B-365/S-405/D-495/OHP-225
post 1551602491 05-15-2018, 07:45 PM
-
#58
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  1. Beelze
  2. The greatest trick.
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Posts: 1,039
  5. Rep Power: 2764
Originally Posted By PeaceWithin⏩
The OP doesn't say it's an arithmetic puzzle, but it gives you the assumption that you will be able to tell who the winner(s) of each heat was. The whole point of saying "no stopwatch" was just so you can't run 5 straight races and then compare times...

I'm still baffled how comparing photo finishes of different races would help you determine who is (absolutely) the fastest without also having a stopwatch to determine how fast the heat was. Just a finish of a horse at the finish line does nothing...

"As I saidfor this question to work you require photo finishes and consistency. You check the photo in the 6th race, every horse is going to be then measurable by the distances between them, and you have the other photo finishes from the other races to check those against, it's simple really."

So... every race needs to finish in the same amount of time? Seems like you're adding a lot of additional parameters to the OP.
If you take out consistency what are you left with, random outcomes? How would that allow for any solution?
post 1551603271 05-15-2018, 07:53 PM
-
#59
  1. PeaceWithin
  2. Future non-fatty
  1. PeaceWithin
  2. Future non-fatty
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Posts: 9,889
  5. Rep Power: 146195
Originally Posted By Beelze⏩
If you take out consistency what are you left with, random outcomes? How would that allow for any solution?
Wut? The whole point of the OP is a puzzle based on ranking winners, excluding losers, and seeing how efficiently you can determine the top three without timing them.

I guess I don't understand what you mean by consistency... Like I said earlier, the OP presupposes that you can determine who won each race. Even if you have photo finishes, comparing photo finishes from multiple different races against the semi-final race is an exercise in futility if you don't have a stopwatch to determine how fast each of those different races was...
MISC Blood Drive (MOD REPS): https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=175220881

Start: B-175/S-185/D-185/OHP-95
Current:B-335/S-365/D-365/OHP-215
Goals: B-365/S-405/D-495/OHP-225
post 1551603831 05-15-2018, 07:59 PM
-
#60
  1. allianc3
  2. Lifetime natty
  1. allianc3
  2. Lifetime natty
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 10,720
  6. Rep Power: 76318
11.

Edit: or 7
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts