Forum
»
Delaware lowers passing score on bar exam in push for racial diversity
03-07-2023, 07:20 AM
-
#121
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By x-trainer
Hey Benny, while we're at it are there any other standards we can lower for you? Anything going on that you might be struggling with that you need virtue signaling white people to make easier for you?Fixated, on your 1 premise, ocd has kicked in...."That is how you personally interpret it....... but you only see 1 way, this is a fact and proven on endless threads by your unidirectional replies.
You don't du nuance, shades of gray or consider all of the variables."
Eject!
You don't du nuance, shades of gray or consider all of the variables."
Eject!

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-07-2023, 07:31 AM
-
#122
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By x-trainer
So what say we dumb down the bar exam so we can get more of them?They do pass it or there would be zero minority lawyers in the state, but obviously he want more to, so that is why it is being modified from the toughest to one of the hardest.
That is how you personally interpret it....... but you only see 1 way, this is a fact and proven on endless threads by your unidirectional replies.
You don't du nuance, shades of gray or consider all of the variables.
Omg Asians are only 2.5% of the entire legal profession, they must be dumb.
https://www.abalegalprofile.com/demo...cs.php#anchor2
That is how you personally interpret it....... but you only see 1 way, this is a fact and proven on endless threads by your unidirectional replies.
You don't du nuance, shades of gray or consider all of the variables.
Omg Asians are only 2.5% of the entire legal profession, they must be dumb.
https://www.abalegalprofile.com/demo...cs.php#anchor2
After all...
Originally Posted By x-trainer
"Nine months after declaring that racial diversity among judges in Delaware “is inadequate,” Supreme Court Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr. released a strategic plan Tuesday to increase the number of Black and Latino members of the Delaware Bar."
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-07-2023, 07:44 AM
-
#123
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Why's he bringing up Asians??? Has it ever crossed his mind that Asians aren't really into becoming lawyers? They're more into technical jobs, that pay a lot of money. I thought someone like Benny would understand this, since he allegedly has friends from all walks of life.......So what say we dumb down the bar exam so we can get more of them?
After all...
After all...
03-07-2023, 07:46 AM
-
#124
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Right? There was that Asiain gang he knew that educated him on something that time lol.Why's he bringing up Asians??? Has it ever crossed his mind that Asians aren't really into becoming lawyers? They're more into technical jobs, that pay a lot of money. I thought someone like Benny would understand this, since he allegedly has friends from all walks of life.......

It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-07-2023, 08:12 AM
-
#125
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
-
- nkiritsis13
- [_]Living [X]Living Dead
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: Rochester, Michigan, United States
- Posts: 8,312
- Rep Power: 331479
-
-
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Expectations are ableist - the ideal human being to them is a thawed out meat popsicle that knows how to check a single party box and pay taxes.They truly are the party of low expectations.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
That's one of the other factors being discounted in their warped view of parity between lawyers and race: according to the left, African American people and culture have a worse relationship with the US legal system as a whole(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess)(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess), so have they considered cultural influence on career path? Sounds awfully insensitive.Why's he bringing up Asians??? Has it ever crossed his mind that Asians aren't really into becoming lawyers? They're more into technical jobs, that pay a lot of money. I thought someone like Benny would understand this, since he allegedly has friends from all walks of life.......
Either way, it really is ignorant to ignore how cultural influencedoeshave some bearing on career paths. Likewise, focusing strictly on population percentages also ignores factors like income level on both individual and community levels. You don't hear about too many rednecks from trailer parks becoming lawyers either, which circles back to cultural tendencies and further extends to more localized values on education that would trend towards careers in the legal field.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to lowering requirements to meet some perverse, leftist white savior complex almost serving as a psychological mechanism to absolve their own racism instead of trying to uplift communities that might be held back not by the color of anyone's skin, but the predominant culture therein.
You could just as well say: would someone supporting these kinds of policy changes prefer to be represented by the lawyer A who passed the traditional exam or the lawyer B who could only pass the revised one?
Spoiler!
Lawyer A is black, lawyer B is white.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
I will stand firm, I refuse to kneel - The fury in me is divine
My dark grave awaits, my fate is revealed - But I'm not afraid to die
If you have any problems or need advice, feel free to ask
03-07-2023, 08:47 AM
-
#126
Originally Posted By nkiritsis13⏩
Exactly. The left sees society as a mathematical equation, based on arbitrary factors. For instance, the federal reserves believes that it can control the path of an economy based on a bunch of ones and zeros. They completely neglect the individual choices made by those in the economy. Marxists believe that each position of power and high income should be represented by a certain percentage that reflects the population. In reality, individuals make the decision of what job or career they go into, The left completely ignores the fact that those percentages reflect the number of individuals who made those decisions, not the number of people who were oppressed. This led me to my own thoughts, that you have to look at what is good and right before you can know what is bad and wrong. The left sees everything as bad and wrong, and ignores what is good and right. This is why we say that the left is backwardsExpectations are ableist - the ideal human being to them is a thawed out meat popsicle that knows how to check a single party box and pay taxes.
That's one of the other factors being discounted in their warped view of parity between lawyers and race: according to the left, African American people and culture have a worse relationship with the US legal system as a whole(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess)(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess), so have they considered cultural influence on career path? Sounds awfully insensitive.
Either way, it really is ignorant to ignore how cultural influencedoeshave some bearing on career paths. Likewise, focusing strictly on population percentages also ignores factors like income level on both individual and community levels. You don't hear about too many rednecks from trailer parks becoming lawyers either, which circles back to cultural tendencies and further extends to more localized values on education that would trend towards careers in the legal field.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to lowering requirements to meet some perverse, leftist white savior complex almost serving as a psychological mechanism to absolve their own racism instead of trying to uplift communities that might be held back not by the color of anyone's skin, but the predominant culture therein.
You could just as well say: would someone supporting these kinds of policy changes prefer to be represented by the lawyer A who passed the traditional exam or the lawyer B who could only pass the revised one?
Spoiler!
That's one of the other factors being discounted in their warped view of parity between lawyers and race: according to the left, African American people and culture have a worse relationship with the US legal system as a whole(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess)(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess), so have they considered cultural influence on career path? Sounds awfully insensitive.
Either way, it really is ignorant to ignore how cultural influencedoeshave some bearing on career paths. Likewise, focusing strictly on population percentages also ignores factors like income level on both individual and community levels. You don't hear about too many rednecks from trailer parks becoming lawyers either, which circles back to cultural tendencies and further extends to more localized values on education that would trend towards careers in the legal field.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to lowering requirements to meet some perverse, leftist white savior complex almost serving as a psychological mechanism to absolve their own racism instead of trying to uplift communities that might be held back not by the color of anyone's skin, but the predominant culture therein.
You could just as well say: would someone supporting these kinds of policy changes prefer to be represented by the lawyer A who passed the traditional exam or the lawyer B who could only pass the revised one?
Spoiler!
Lawyer A is black, lawyer B is white.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
Another piece of the evidence that supports this, is if you look at affirmative action. The individuals in minority groups who choose to go to college, and take advantage of affirmative action, are made up of educated and affluent, while the poor choose not to go to college, even when they have additional resources to do so. In other words, the continued making the same decisions before and after affirmative action, and all affirmative action is doing is making the wealthy wealthier.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
03-07-2023, 08:58 AM
-
#127
- DumpsterFire
- Registered User
-
- DumpsterFire
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Age: 38
- Posts: 4,496
- Rep Power: 44258
-
-
Just got caught up reading this thread. I honestly can't handle how fukkin stupid ben is.
**Drinks colon cleanse for fun crew**
03-07-2023, 10:22 AM
-
#128
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Oh yeah, all those black guys knocking out Asians, and robbing them, they better watch out when they get to jail/prison, because the Hardcore Korean gangbangers are gonna make them pay.......Right? There was that Asiain gang he knew that educated him on something that time lol.

03-07-2023, 10:24 AM
-
#129
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By nkiritsis13⏩
But what do those rednecks end up doing? They get a job that's physical, blue collar. And there's nothing wrong with that. No matter what someone like ****bag Sillie says.Expectations are ableist - the ideal human being to them is a thawed out meat popsicle that knows how to check a single party box and pay taxes.
That's one of the other factors being discounted in their warped view of parity between lawyers and race: according to the left, African American people and culture have a worse relationship with the US legal system as a whole(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess)(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess), so have they considered cultural influence on career path? Sounds awfully insensitive.
Either way, it really is ignorant to ignore how cultural influencedoeshave some bearing on career paths. Likewise, focusing strictly on population percentages also ignores factors like income level on both individual and community levels. You don't hear about too many rednecks from trailer parks becoming lawyers either, which circles back to cultural tendencies and further extends to more localized values on education that would trend towards careers in the legal field.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to lowering requirements to meet some perverse, leftist white savior complex almost serving as a psychological mechanism to absolve their own racism instead of trying to uplift communities that might be held back not by the color of anyone's skin, but the predominant culture therein.
You could just as well say: would someone supporting these kinds of policy changes prefer to be represented by the lawyer A who passed the traditional exam or the lawyer B who could only pass the revised one?
Spoiler!
That's one of the other factors being discounted in their warped view of parity between lawyers and race: according to the left, African American people and culture have a worse relationship with the US legal system as a whole(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess)(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess), so have they considered cultural influence on career path? Sounds awfully insensitive.
Either way, it really is ignorant to ignore how cultural influencedoeshave some bearing on career paths. Likewise, focusing strictly on population percentages also ignores factors like income level on both individual and community levels. You don't hear about too many rednecks from trailer parks becoming lawyers either, which circles back to cultural tendencies and further extends to more localized values on education that would trend towards careers in the legal field.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to lowering requirements to meet some perverse, leftist white savior complex almost serving as a psychological mechanism to absolve their own racism instead of trying to uplift communities that might be held back not by the color of anyone's skin, but the predominant culture therein.
You could just as well say: would someone supporting these kinds of policy changes prefer to be represented by the lawyer A who passed the traditional exam or the lawyer B who could only pass the revised one?
Spoiler!
Lawyer A is black, lawyer B is white.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
03-07-2023, 10:28 AM
-
#130
- NitrogenWidget
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: United States
- Posts: 43,261
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 349299
-
-
Originally Posted By nkiritsis13⏩
in liberal clown world Lawyer A doesn't exist.Expectations are ableist - the ideal human being to them is a thawed out meat popsicle that knows how to check a single party box and pay taxes.
That's one of the other factors being discounted in their warped view of parity between lawyers and race: according to the left, African American people and culture have a worse relationship with the US legal system as a whole(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess)(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess), so have they considered cultural influence on career path? Sounds awfully insensitive.
Either way, it really is ignorant to ignore how cultural influencedoeshave some bearing on career paths. Likewise, focusing strictly on population percentages also ignores factors like income level on both individual and community levels. You don't hear about too many rednecks from trailer parks becoming lawyers either, which circles back to cultural tendencies and further extends to more localized values on education that would trend towards careers in the legal field.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to lowering requirements to meet some perverse, leftist white savior complex almost serving as a psychological mechanism to absolve their own racism instead of trying to uplift communities that might be held back not by the color of anyone's skin, but the predominant culture therein.
You could just as well say: would someone supporting these kinds of policy changes prefer to be represented by the lawyer A who passed the traditional exam or the lawyer B who could only pass the revised one?
Spoiler!
That's one of the other factors being discounted in their warped view of parity between lawyers and race: according to the left, African American people and culture have a worse relationship with the US legal system as a whole(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess)(since they apparently never grew up on Family Matters or watched Die Hard I guess), so have they considered cultural influence on career path? Sounds awfully insensitive.
Either way, it really is ignorant to ignore how cultural influencedoeshave some bearing on career paths. Likewise, focusing strictly on population percentages also ignores factors like income level on both individual and community levels. You don't hear about too many rednecks from trailer parks becoming lawyers either, which circles back to cultural tendencies and further extends to more localized values on education that would trend towards careers in the legal field.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to lowering requirements to meet some perverse, leftist white savior complex almost serving as a psychological mechanism to absolve their own racism instead of trying to uplift communities that might be held back not by the color of anyone's skin, but the predominant culture therein.
You could just as well say: would someone supporting these kinds of policy changes prefer to be represented by the lawyer A who passed the traditional exam or the lawyer B who could only pass the revised one?
Spoiler!
Lawyer A is black, lawyer B is white.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
Personally, I'd pick Lawyer A because melanin. Should. Not. Be. A. Factor. Bunch of closeted-ass racists.
03-07-2023, 11:44 AM
-
#131
reporting is from fox news. You don't know what part of it to believe or if the narrative they are pushing is accurate. What kind of clown do you have to be to trust an outlet that is constantly in court saying they shouldn't be trusted? Where is the analysis of other states' requirements for example? Why is 145 - 143 significant?
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=182947223
The rest of your comment is simply broad brush stroke BS assumptions about people. What statistics are you basing any of it on?
Your entire position is based on dueling strawmen.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=182947223
Originally Posted By Kraken⏩
you're being silly. even if they accept individual choices made by those in the economy, they still have to do their damn job. Which is partly trying to influence those choices towards an end. Lowering or increasing interest rates affects decisions made.Exactly. The left sees society as a mathematical equation, based on arbitrary factors. For instance, the federal reserves believes that it can control the path of an economy based on a bunch of ones and zeros. They completely neglect the individual choices made by those in the economy. Marxists believe that each position of power and high income should be represented by a certain percentage that reflects the population. In reality, individuals make the decision of what job or career they go into, The left completely ignores the fact that those percentages reflect the number of individuals who made those decisions, not the number of people who were oppressed. This led me to my own thoughts, that you have to look at what is good and right before you can know what is bad and wrong. The left sees everything as bad and wrong, and ignores what is good and right. This is why we say that the left is backwards
Another piece of the evidence that supports this, is if you look at affirmative action. The individuals in minority groups who choose to go to college, and take advantage of affirmative action, are made up of educated and affluent, while the poor choose not to go to college, even when they have additional resources to do so. In other words, the continued making the same decisions before and after affirmative action, and all affirmative action is doing is making the wealthy wealthier.
Another piece of the evidence that supports this, is if you look at affirmative action. The individuals in minority groups who choose to go to college, and take advantage of affirmative action, are made up of educated and affluent, while the poor choose not to go to college, even when they have additional resources to do so. In other words, the continued making the same decisions before and after affirmative action, and all affirmative action is doing is making the wealthy wealthier.
The rest of your comment is simply broad brush stroke BS assumptions about people. What statistics are you basing any of it on?
Your entire position is based on dueling strawmen.
Is there no limit to what people will believe if it is prefaced by the phrase,
"Scientists say" ?
I rep back +0
03-07-2023, 11:58 AM
-
#132
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
-
- Bushmaster
- Masculine Toxicity
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 68,360
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 700751
-
-
Originally Posted By semitope⏩
Well, there's Reuters...reporting is from fox news. You don't know what part of it to believe or if the narrative they are pushing is accurate.What kind of clown do you have to be to trust an outlet that is constantly in court saying they shouldn't be trusted?
https://www.reuters.com/legal/govern...ng-2023-02-21/
And Delaware Online...
https://www.delawareonline.com/story...w/69925167007/
And Yahoo....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/delaware-...222755954.html
I mean if you don't like Fox News as a source that is.
Originally Posted By semitope⏩
Because minorities can't pass it apparently.Where is the analysis of other states' requirements for example? Why is 145 - 143 significant?
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
03-07-2023, 12:26 PM
-
#133
Originally Posted By semitope⏩
So let me see if I have this right; your argument is that the federal government's job is to influence society? Interesting.reporting is from fox news. You don't know what part of it to believe or if the narrative they are pushing is accurate. What kind of clown do you have to be to trust an outlet that is constantly in court saying they shouldn't be trusted? Where is the analysis of other states' requirements for example? Why is 145 - 143 significant?
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=182947223
you're being silly. even if they accept individual choices made by those in the economy, they still have to do their damn job. Which is partly trying to influence those choices towards an end. Lowering or increasing interest rates affects decisions made.
The rest of your comment is simply broad brush stroke BS assumptions about people. What statistics are you basing any of it on?
Your entire position is based on dueling strawmen.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=182947223
you're being silly. even if they accept individual choices made by those in the economy, they still have to do their damn job. Which is partly trying to influence those choices towards an end. Lowering or increasing interest rates affects decisions made.
The rest of your comment is simply broad brush stroke BS assumptions about people. What statistics are you basing any of it on?
Your entire position is based on dueling strawmen.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
03-07-2023, 02:14 PM
-
#134
03-07-2023, 03:35 PM
-
#135
- Godfrd824
- Join Date: Oct 2008
- Location: DevilMayRage's Head, Rent Free
- Posts: 57,325
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 385082
-
-
What black person or persons asked for this? The white liberal strikes again.
When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.
03-07-2023, 07:56 PM
-
#136
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
I swear, I'm in a state of disbelief in how ignorant and pathetic these leftists can be.......Well, there's Reuters...
https://www.reuters.com/legal/govern...ng-2023-02-21/
And Delaware Online...
https://www.delawareonline.com/story...w/69925167007/
And Yahoo....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/delaware-...222755954.html
I mean if you don't like Fox News as a source that is.
Because minorities can't pass it apparently.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/govern...ng-2023-02-21/
And Delaware Online...
https://www.delawareonline.com/story...w/69925167007/
And Yahoo....
https://www.yahoo.com/news/delaware-...222755954.html
I mean if you don't like Fox News as a source that is.
Because minorities can't pass it apparently.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
