Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
ยป Trump admits he'd let Putin annex Ukraine to end war.
  1. Results 91 to 118 of 118
  2. First
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
post 1678897663 03-13-2023, 05:04 PM
-
#91
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
Michael McFaul is a PhD scholar and thinks this can happen. The thinking is he will use the conflict with the west to militarize his country and assemble a large army while sowing discord in the US. They believe Trump or others in the GOP are compromised or just ideologically hostile to NATO and will seek to disband or weaken NATO, which would then open the door long term for Putin to invade Lithuania and/or Moldova or something and then keep rolling through the Baltics. The situation is more complex than you think, Dave. And it is possible they are right even though I don't think so. They fear a long term plan to rebuild the USSR. It sounds farfetched, but it is a fact Putin invaded, and it is a fact he has repeatedly and consistently annexed little bits and pieces of territory over the years.

Now, Putin has pledged explicitly not to do this for this very reason. He has said he won't militarize Russia. We'll just have to see what happens here.
First off, how would the US disband NATO???

And Russia can barely take the small parts of Ukraine that it acquired, but it's suddenly gonna be like a C&C computer game, where they take over all of Europe???
post 1678897753 03-13-2023, 05:06 PM
-
#92
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe
I heard they resurrected the Sokol project. There's only one man for the job.
Timothy Dalton was underrated as Bond.
post 1678898043 03-13-2023, 05:14 PM
-
#93
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Posts: 4,136
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
First off, how would the US disband NATO???

And Russia can barely take the small parts of Ukraine that it acquired, but it's suddenly gonna be like a C&C computer game, where they take over all of Europe???
Trump threatened to do it. We could just say fuk it and pull our forces out or drastically reduce troop numbers and stop funding it.

I agree with you. I find the hypothesis and reasoning to be wrong. But remember, Russia is quite powerful with their weapons. Imagine Putin assembles a military of like 10 M people while we are in a social collapse and have pulled out of NATO. One could see him going after Lithuania specifically to get a land connection to Kaliningrad.

It may not seem likely, but it is always something to fear. I don't completely trust Putin and neither should anyone. This guy has and will kill for Russian power and has already launched an invasion. We have only his word he won't militarize his country. But his word doesn't mean much nowadays.

For the record, I agree with you. I am just showing the other side's view.
post 1678898323 03-13-2023, 05:18 PM
-
#94
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
Trump threatened to do it. We could just say fuk it and pull our forces out or drastically reduce troop numbers and stop funding it.

I agree with you. I find the hypothesis and reasoning to be wrong. But remember, Russia is quite powerful with their weapons. Imagine Putin assembles a military of like 10 M people while we are in a social collapse and have pulled out of NATO. One could see him going after Lithuania specifically to get a land connection to Kaliningrad.
Are we in a social collapse???

And an army of 10 million??? Christ Wincel, where are you coming up with this???
post 1678898333 03-13-2023, 05:19 PM
-
#95
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By NYPat
Lmfao he "clearly did his job". LOL no. He got impeached twice and should have been removed from office - twice.
Impeached twice= Acquitted twice...making him the most acquitted President in U.S. History.




.





.





.




.





just playin with you Pat.
post 1678898563 03-13-2023, 05:23 PM
-
#96
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Posts: 4,136
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Are we in a social collapse???

And an army of 10 million??? Christ Wincel, where are you coming up with this???
I'm painting a picture. Imagine the war drags on in Ukraine. And imagine sentiment here reaches a boiling point and you have weakened support for NATO. Imagine Trump or whoever is unable to end the war and instead you see Putin start expanding his military and militarizing his economy. Then yes, he could raise a huge army and do something and justify it using the war. It has happened several times in history.

And he'd need a ginormous army like that to rebuild the USSR. He couldn't do it with what he has now.

This is devil's advocate. I realize how it sounds farfetched, and that's because it is. It would literally be WW3.
post 1678898963 03-13-2023, 05:33 PM
-
#97
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
I'm painting a picture. Imagine the war drags on in Ukraine. And imagine sentiment here reaches a boiling point and you have weakened support for NATO. Imagine Trump or whoever is unable to end the war and instead you see Putin start expanding his military and militarizing his economy. Then yes, he could raise a huge army and do something and justify it using the war. It has happened several times in history.

And he'd need a ginormous army like that to rebuild the USSR. He couldn't do it with what he has now.

This is devil's advocate. I realize how it sounds farfetched, and that's because it is. It would literally be WW3.
Why are you bringing up Trump??? He's not in charge.

Also, when wars tend to drag on, it usually turns the population against the country waging it.

Vietnam dragged on, and look what happened.

Look at what happened with Afghanistan when it came to the Russians, and with us.

The Iraq-Iran war lasted 8 years. Did Saddam suddenly raise an army of 5 million and take Iran??? Did the Ayatollah of Iran???

And you think if he somehow raised an army of 10 million, the world is just going to be like, "Oh well......"
post 1678899473 03-13-2023, 05:46 PM
-
#98
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Posts: 4,136
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Why are you bringing up Trump??? He's not in charge.

Also, when wars tend to drag on, it usually turns the population against the country waging it.

Vietnam dragged on, and look what happened.

Look at what happened with Afghanistan when it came to the Russians, and with us.

The Iraq-Iran war lasted 8 years. Did Saddam suddenly raise an army of 5 million and take Iran??? Did the Ayatollah of Iran???

And you think if he somehow raised an army of 10 million, the world is just going to be like, "Oh well......"
I'm saying if Trump wins.

Depends. Russia is authoritarian and capable of sliding back. Saddam didn't have the economy or power to do it. I'll remind you it wasn't too long ago the USSR had an enormous military. Even before they collapsed, they had 2 million men.

No. The world would fight. That's why it would be WW3. But if America went full isolationist, it might invite an attack on those states.

Can't help but notice you're deliberately ignoring that I agree with you and am simply being devil's advocate here. You already know my position on Russia.

None of this is what "I think".
post 1678899793 03-13-2023, 05:57 PM
-
#99
  1. Abzu
  2. Registered User
  1. Abzu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 8,174
  6. Rep Power: 47196
This is a very interesting yet complex topic but the substantive information is public and if you are smart, you can read.

Trump says Putin wouldn't have invaded if he were in office, well, let's examine the claim. Russia invaded Ukraine for the same reason anyone does anything, motive and opportunity. Putin was motivated by fear, fear Ukraine, a country on it's border would fall under the complete control of Western Bloc and he was given the opportunity to act due to the political actions of the U.S. which caused oil to become extremely valuable.

Would Trump have given Putin motive and opportunity by threatening to take control of Ukraine and place it in the Western Bloc or would he tell Ukraine to fend for themselves, come out with a deal and save innocent lives? Would Trump promise to shutdown oil production in America while America's federal reserve raised interest rates aggressively but too late? If Trump wouldn't do these things then the chances of Russia invading Ukraine are far below 50%.



As things stand today Russia will take over parts of Ukraine if not the whole country, they are taking it whether Ukraine allows it or not, the question is, how many must die first?
I: Self, Lord and Master.

"I rub my hands when my palms itch."

"I call you Son not because you Shine but because you Mine."
post 1678899873 03-13-2023, 06:00 PM
-
#100
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
I'm saying if Trump wins.

Depends. Russia is authoritarian and capable of sliding back. Saddam didn't have the economy or power to do it. I'll remind you it wasn't too long ago the USSR had an enormous military. Even before they collapsed, they had 2 million men.

No. The world would fight. That's why it would be WW3. But if America went full isolationist, it might invite an attack on those states.

Can't help but notice you're deliberately ignoring that I agree with you and am simply being devil's advocate here. You already know my position on Russia.

None of this is what "I think".
This is what could very well happen. The US seems set on dragging China into a war. These hopeful warmongers that are already stating to the public "we could see China arming Russia"..have a good chance of making it come to fruition. Next thing you know we drag Israel (whom already has issues with Russia), and Russia/China brings in Middle Eastern countries that have been wanting to take down Israel and America for decades...

Gee, it's almost like that Book you hate so much foretold all this already...but I'm sure you knew that..right Wincel?
post 1678899993 03-13-2023, 06:02 PM
-
#101
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
I'm saying if Trump wins.

Depends. Russia is authoritarian and capable of sliding back. Saddam didn't have the economy or power to do it. I'll remind you it wasn't too long ago the USSR had an enormous military. Even before they collapsed, they had 2 million men.

No. The world would fight. That's why it would be WW3. But if America went full isolationist, it might invite an attack on those states.

Can't help but notice you're deliberately ignoring that I agree with you and am simply being devil's advocate here. You already know my position on Russia.

None of this is what "I think".
There's a difference between 2 million men and 10 million men.
post 1678900073 03-13-2023, 06:04 PM
-
#102
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Paul
This is what could very well happen. The US seems set on dragging China into a war. These hopeful warmongers that are already stating to the public "we could see China arming Russia"..have a good chance of making it come to fruition. Next thing you know we drag Israel (whom already has issues with Russia), and Russia/China brings in Middle Eastern countries that have been wanting to take down Israel and America for decades...

Gee, it's almost like that Book you hate so much foretold all this already...but I'm sure you knew that..right Wincel?
Drag Israel into what?
post 1678900143 03-13-2023, 06:05 PM
-
#103
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
Drag Israel into what?
WW3..Armageddon.
post 1678900183 03-13-2023, 06:05 PM
-
#104
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,768
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
Trump threatened to do it. We could just say fuk it and pull our forces out or drastically reduce troop numbers and stop funding it.

I agree with you. I find the hypothesis and reasoning to be wrong. But remember, Russia is quite powerful with their weapons. Imagine Putin assembles a military of like 10 M people while we are in a social collapse and have pulled out of NATO. One could see him going after Lithuania specifically to get a land connection to Kaliningrad.

It may not seem likely, but it is always something to fear. I don't completely trust Putin and neither should anyone. This guy has and will kill for Russian power and has already launched an invasion. We have only his word he won't militarize his country. But his word doesn't mean much nowadays.

For the record, I agree with you. I am just showing the other side's view.
I find this highly unlikely but can you imagine if we pulled out of nato and told these euro cucks they have to deal with putin on their own

Hnnnnng
โ€œItโ€™s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.โ€ Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1678900303 03-13-2023, 06:07 PM
-
#105
  1. Mountaineer92
  2. TOP G
  1. Mountaineer92
  2. TOP G
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 20,218
  5. Rep Power: 155449
oh wow... give up territory in ukraine to russia that is pro russia anyway or allow the biggest money laundering operation to continue...

only way i support the latter is if it ends up sending chit libs and OP to kyiv. i think its time for cocktail/limousine liberals, along with their peasants: the fake lawyers, chit smearers that have fake degrees, dying chitbaggers, rapey diabetics etc. go fight for your country, ukraine.
PUREBLOOD CREW
Top G Crew

#1 Misc Tate supporter.

If you are reading this - go do 100 push ups.
post 1678900433 03-13-2023, 06:10 PM
-
#106
  1. Abzu
  2. Registered User
  1. Abzu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 8,174
  6. Rep Power: 47196
Originally Posted By davik
youre such a dumbass i cant believe you think youre smart. annex ukraine vs annex parts of ukraine are 2 different things idiot. obama already let them annex part of it. what are you gonna do to stop russia anyway
Lol this thread got murdered in the first reply lol.
I: Self, Lord and Master.

"I rub my hands when my palms itch."

"I call you Son not because you Shine but because you Mine."
post 1678900523 03-13-2023, 06:11 PM
-
#107
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Abzu
Lol this thread got murdered in the first reply lol.
and that dude never posts in the R/P which makes it even more hysterical, lol
post 1678900983 03-13-2023, 06:22 PM
-
#108
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Posts: 4,136
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Paul
WW3..Armageddon.
mental illness
post 1678902683 03-13-2023, 07:02 PM
-
#109
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
Did you read Bodhy's comment later clarifying what he meant? lol

You guys are so outrageously hostile that you don't even try to see his point. Sad.
I don't recall ever saying Trump was on the Kremlin's payroll. I've repeatedly said Putin wants to ruin Western democracy and he wanted Trump into the WH. Whether Trump was complicit in this is immaterial, because Trump naturally foments divide anyway and this is what Putin wanted.


As for collusion? Collusion isn't a crime and is without explicit legal meaning. And if someone is claiming Trump was 'exonerated' from collusion Mueller's words were the exact opposite and you can't be exonerated from collusion anyway since it's not a crime.


They just love stuffing words into my mouth to get their boogeyman. They've been doing it ever since I been here.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1678902843 03-13-2023, 07:05 PM
-
#110
  1. Mountaineer92
  2. TOP G
  1. Mountaineer92
  2. TOP G
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 20,218
  5. Rep Power: 155449
Originally Posted By Bodhy
I don't recall ever saying Trump was on the Kremlin's payroll. I've repeatedly said Putin wants to ruin Western democracy and he wanted Trump into the WH. Whether Trump was complicit in this is immaterial, because Trump naturally foments divide anyway and this is what Putin wanted.


As for collusion? Collusion isn't a crime and is without explicit legal meaning. And if someone is claiming Trump was 'exonerated' from collusion Mueller's words were the exact opposite and you can't be exonerated from collusion anyway since it's not a crime.


They just love stuffing words into my mouth to get their boogeyman. They've been doing it ever since I been here.
you are literally the dumbest fking person here lmao.
PUREBLOOD CREW
Top G Crew

#1 Misc Tate supporter.

If you are reading this - go do 100 push ups.
post 1678904043 03-13-2023, 07:35 PM
-
#111
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Bodhy
I don't recall ever saying Trump was on the Kremlin's payroll. I've repeatedly said Putin wants to ruin Western democracy and he wanted Trump into the WH. Whether Trump was complicit in this is immaterial, because Trump naturally foments divide anyway and this is what Putin wanted.


As for collusion? Collusion isn't a crime and is without explicit legal meaning. And if someone is claiming Trump was 'exonerated' from collusion Mueller's words were the exact opposite and you can't be exonerated from collusion anyway since it's not a crime.


They just love stuffing words into my mouth to get their boogeyman. They've been doing it ever since I been here.
A PHD scholar ladies and gentlemen......
post 1678904143 03-13-2023, 07:38 PM
-
#112
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Posts: 4,136
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Bodhy
I don't recall ever saying Trump was on the Kremlin's payroll. I've repeatedly said Putin wants to ruin Western democracy and he wanted Trump into the WH. Whether Trump was complicit in this is immaterial, because Trump naturally foments divide anyway and this is what Putin wanted.


As for collusion? Collusion isn't a crime and is without explicit legal meaning. And if someone is claiming Trump was 'exonerated' from collusion Mueller's words were the exact opposite and you can't be exonerated from collusion anyway since it's not a crime.


They just love stuffing words into my mouth to get their boogeyman. They've been doing it ever since I been here.
yep
post 1678904163 03-13-2023, 07:39 PM
-
#113
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  1. TaiMaiSchutze
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Posts: 4,136
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Mountaineer92
you are literally the dumbest fking person here lmao.
says the Andrew Tate follower...fkin lmao
post 1678904513 03-13-2023, 07:44 PM
-
#114
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
says the Andrew Tate follower...fkin lmao
stings a little extra, huh
post 1678904633 03-13-2023, 07:45 PM
-
#115
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By TaiMaiSchutze
yep
His own quotes are putting words in his mouth?
post 1678916643 03-14-2023, 12:33 AM
-
#116
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  1. DDSF1
  2. Better than you
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Posts: 27,860
  5. Rep Power: 260144
Originally Posted By Bodhy
I don't recall ever saying Trump was on the Kremlin's payroll. I've repeatedly said Putin wants to ruin Western democracy and he wanted Trump into the WH. Whether Trump was complicit in this is immaterial, because Trump naturally foments divide anyway and this is what Putin wanted.


As for collusion? Collusion isn't a crime and is without explicit legal meaning. And if someone is claiming Trump was 'exonerated' from collusion Mueller's words were the exact opposite and you can't be exonerated from collusion anyway since it's not a crime.


They just love stuffing words into my mouth to get their boogeyman. They've been doing it ever since I been here.
Fraudhy, the frauding lying sh*t smearing tranny fuker--where are the transcripts?
post 1678934193 03-14-2023, 08:13 AM
-
#117
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  1. kcadrenalin
  2. Permanent Vacation
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Posts: 24,727
  5. Rep Power: 349124
R&P libs: iF rUsSiA aNnExEs uKrAIne pUtIn wIlI sTEamrOlL EuRoPE

Me: looking at a map of the old Soviet Union that was 10 times stronger than it is now, and never once tried to "steamroll" Europe in it's 70 year existence.



This is not our fight and we should not be involved.
As for NATO, i have no problem with the US being a member, but we should not have to fund a penny of it.
________

MFC

________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
post 1678934493 03-14-2023, 08:17 AM
-
#118
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By kcadrenalin
R&P libs: iF rUsSiA aNnExEs uKrAIne pUtIn wIlI sTEamrOlL EuRoPE

Me: looking at a map of the old Soviet Union that was 10 times stronger than it is now, and never once tried to "steamroll" Europe in it's 70 year existence.



This is not our fight and we should not be involved.
As for NATO, i have no problem with the US being a member, but we should not have to fund a penny of it.
yeah I can't believe anyone views Russia as a legitimate threat anymore
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts