liberals

How would you know?

There are a million artists and composers you’ve never heard of who are better than people you have

Nepotism, sponsorship, right circle, luck, apprenticeships etc

It’s the one thing you can be sure of

Exactly like saying “Most men are monosyllabic, self obsessed and geeky”

NAMALT

The famous IQ graph PROVES there are both dumber and smarter men than women.


Why Miscers try to disprove this is weird and stupid.

Keep on knocking down those paper tigers breh.

Somewhere deep down, I'm sure it makes you feel like you're winning.

Personal attack instead of trying to disprove a well known scientifically proven graph that shows men have higher IQ on the outskirts.

A sure sign of a lost argument.

I can name loads of men I could beat at chess, I’m still chit on a world scale, what about you?


Charlotte Bronte

Rena Kanakogi

George Eliot

Your idea of “better” is destroyed by historical societal gender inequality

Then maybe you're not thinking hard enough because five of the top ten best selling book series of the twenty-first century are written by women, including Suzanne Collins (Hunger Games), Veronica Roth (Divergent) and Stephanie Meyer (Twilight).

Those who did make it did it against the odds, not with everything in their favour

The concept is not that she would beat a male but that cards have been historically stacked against, it’s not a level playing field so wtf do you expect.

Those who did make it did it against the odds, not with everything in their favour

the best cooks tend to be men, despite the fact that cooking has pretty much always been associated with women.

Typical red twat finds a meme to hide behind

I’ve made the only point in this thread worth making upthread

Women don't have the same sort of curiosity about the world that men do unless they are man-brained (smart, inquisitive, roll up the sleeves and fix stuff type girls). You can usually tell because they are the ones who want to know how things work, try to understand stuff etc.

The concept is not that she would beat a male but that cards have been historically stacked against, it’s not a level playing field so wtf do you expect.

Those who did make it did it against the odds, not with everything in their favour

Women: "The cards have historically been stacked against us, wtf do you expect?"

Black people, hardly one generation out of slavery: "We declare this the Jazz Age!"

Women: "The cards have historically been stacked against us, wtf do you expect?"

Black people, hardly one generation out of slavery: "We declare this the Jazz Age!"

It is incredibly obvious once you just ponder the evolutionary aspect.

Somebody has to birth and raise the next generation. This is an extremely vital and time consuming task. Why the hell would NATURE push females to create, explore, etc, etc? These are things that are completely contradictory to their natural role. Do you notice how the personality traits that they DO inherit, like empathy, sociability, etc. all aid in child rearing and "supporting" the tribe?

There are plenty of great creatives (writers, actresses, singers, etc.) throughout Western Civilization like the Bronte sisters,Ayn Rand, Maya Angelou.

Wrong, you idiot.

The IQ distribution between the genders is NOT interchangeable. Mapped as a bell-curve, men make up the large majority of BOTH extreme ends of the IQ bell-curve, which essentially means that most of the smartest (ie: geniuses) AND dumbest people on the planet are men. Females on the other hand predominantly group together in the middle (ie: average intelligence). Since intelligence obviously factors heavily into creative genius, the sheer reality that there are considerably more male geniuses than female geniuses is going to mean a higher proportion of male creative output.

It isn't just intelligence though. Creative genius requires certain KEY psychological characteristics and behaviours, most important of all probably being obsessive behaviour. You have to be OBSESSED to become a genius level musician, painter, sculptor, inventor, writer, etc, etc. Obsessive behavior is predominantly a MALE character trait, we know this by the fact that boys greatly outnumber girls in terms of mental conditions such as autism. Another huge factor is risk-taking behaviour, which again is a predominantly male trait. Think about it logically: females are the key to the succession of the human race, which means that naturally they would have evolved programming which would keep them SAFE by minimizing risk-taking behaviour. Why do you think that virtually every absolutely ridiculous human feat was attempted by a man? Think of the Wright Brothers: do you think that a woman is going to get the idea to actually attempt to build a flying machine and jump off the cliff while strapped into it? There is no evolutionary basis for a woman to put her life on the line in that fashion. Men on the other hand are DRIVEN to conquer and explore. This innate DRIVE is what leads to curiosity, which leads to creative genius.

This is all basic human gender differences. Yes, there are female geniuses and there are females capable of creative genius. Is it ever going to be a 50/50 split? No, because that isn't how humans are wired.

Thousands of years of exclusion from higher education/guilds/etc. None of these places allowed women to be a part of them. Even recently you find out more and more women were responsible for some pretty amazing discoveries and inventions but then their boss or someone would take the credit and exclude them from the publishing credits.